Paper Details

  1. Home
  2. Paper Details

Indirect comparisons of treatment effects: Network meta-analyses.

Author: SormaniMaria Pia

Journal ArticleAn article published in an academic or professional journal that reports original research or scholarly analysis.
Meta-AnalysisA statistical technique that integrates the results of multiple studies to draw more general conclusions about a particular issue.
ReviewAn article that critically examines existing research on a particular topic and summarizes the current state of knowledge in the field.

Overview

There are many different medications available for multiple sclerosis (MS), but they haven't been directly compared to each other in clinical trials. This article describes a method called "network meta-analysis" that can be used to indirectly compare the effectiveness of different treatments for MS. The abstract does not provide specific results, only a discussion of the method. Therefore, we cannot provide a summary of the study's findings.
Paper Details　
Original Abstract of the Article :
Many therapeutic options are now available for patients with multiple sclerosis. While the efficacy of each drug has been assessed against placebo or, more recently, against interferon, no direct comparisons of these new therapies have been conducted in randomized clinical trials. Therefore, indirec...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel IconDr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について

ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。

* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。


引用元：
https://doi.org/10.1177/1352458517690272

データ提供：米国国立医学図書館（NLM）

Indirect Comparisons: Navigating the Desert of Multiple Sclerosis Therapies

The treatment landscape for multiple sclerosis (MS), a complex neurological condition, resembles a vast desert with multiple paths. This research explores the use of network meta-analyses, a statistical technique that allows for indirect comparisons of different treatments. These analyses are crucial when direct head-to-head comparisons between treatments are lacking, which is often the case in MS research. The researchers delve into the potential of network meta-analyses to inform clinical decisions and navigate the complex array of MS treatment options.

Network Meta-Analyses Provide Valuable Insights

This research highlights the value of network meta-analyses in the field of MS. By enabling indirect comparisons, these analyses provide insights into the relative effectiveness of different treatment options, even in the absence of direct head-to-head trials. This is a critical tool for clinicians, allowing them to make informed decisions about the best treatment strategies for their MS patients.

Implications for MS Treatment

The application of network meta-analyses in MS research holds great promise for improving patient care. By providing a comprehensive understanding of treatment effectiveness across various options, these analyses can contribute to individualized therapy plans that align with each patient's specific needs and goals. This research suggests that network meta-analyses can be a powerful tool in the desert of MS treatment, helping clinicians navigate the landscape and provide optimal care.

Dr. Camel's Conclusion

This research underscores the importance of navigating the vast desert of MS therapies with the right tools. Network meta-analyses, like trusty camels guiding explorers through a vast desert, provide a means for comparing and understanding the effectiveness of various treatment options, enabling clinicians to make informed decisions and tailor treatment plans to individual patients.

Date :
  1. Date Completed 2018-02-27
  2. Date Revised 2019-12-10
Further Info :

Pubmed ID

28273772

DOI: Digital Object Identifier

10.1177/1352458517690272

SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages

English

Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.

This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.