Paper Details

  1. Home
  2. Paper Details

Quality of Life Outcomes after Primary Treatment for Clinically Localised Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review.

Author: BellmuntJoaquim, BollaMichel, BourkeLiam, BriersErik, CornfordPhilip, CumberbatchMarcus G, De SantisMaria, FossatiNicola, GrossTobias, HenryAnn M, JoniauSteven, LamThomas B, LardasMichael, LiewMatthew, MasonMalcolm D, MottetNicolas, RouvièreOlivier, SchootsIvo G, Van den BroeckThomas, WiegelThomas, WillemsePeter-Paul M, YuanCathy Yuhong, van den BerghRoderick C, van der PoelHenk G

Comparative StudyResearch that compares multiple groups/interventions to determine differences/similarities in outcomes/characteristics.
Journal ArticleAn article published in an academic or professional journal that reports original research or scholarly analysis.
ReviewAn article that critically examines existing research on a particular topic and summarizes the current state of knowledge in the field.
Systematic ReviewA review that systematically collects, evaluates, and integrates relevant research to answer a specific research question.

Overview

This systematic review compared the impact of different primary treatments on cancer-specific quality of life (QoL) for men with clinically localized prostate cancer. Active surveillance was found to have the lowest impact on QoL, while surgery had a negative impact on urinary and sexual function and EBRT had a negative impact on bowel function. Brachytherapy had a negative impact on urinary function 1 year post-treatment, but no significant urinary toxicity was reported at 5 years.
Paper Details　
Original Abstract of the Article :
CONTEXT: Current evidence-based management for clinically localised prostate cancer includes active surveillance, surgery, external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and brachytherapy. The impact of these treatment modalities on quality of life (QoL) is uncertain. OBJECTIVE: To systematically review compara...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel IconDr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について

ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。

* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。


引用元：
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2017.06.035

データ提供：米国国立医学図書館（NLM）

Prostate Cancer: Navigating the Desert of Treatment Choices

This research explores the challenging world of prostate cancer, a common type of cancer that affects men worldwide. It's like a vast desert, where the terrain is treacherous and the journey is often fraught with uncertainty. This study focuses on the impact of different treatment options for prostate cancer on quality of life (QoL), a crucial consideration for patients navigating this difficult landscape. The researchers are like experienced desert guides, helping patients choose the best path for their individual journey.

Active Surveillance: A Steady Trek Through the Desert

The study found that active surveillance, which involves closely monitoring the cancer without immediate treatment, had the least impact on QoL, offering a relatively comfortable journey through the desert. However, surgery and external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) had more significant negative impacts on QoL, particularly on urinary and sexual function, potentially causing discomfort and limitations for patients. It's like a camel facing rugged terrain or encountering a harsh sandstorm, potentially leading to difficulties and setbacks on the journey.

Choosing the Right Path: A Guided Desert Journey

This research provides valuable insights for men diagnosed with prostate cancer, helping them make informed decisions about their treatment. It's like having a map and a compass, guiding them through the choices and potential consequences of each treatment option. By understanding the impact of these choices on their QoL, patients can make a more informed decision, ensuring a more comfortable and fulfilling journey through the desert of their diagnosis.

Dr.Camel's Conclusion

This study emphasizes the importance of considering QoL when making treatment decisions for prostate cancer. It's like choosing the right camel for the desert journey, one that's strong enough to handle the terrain but also comfortable and reliable. By understanding the potential impact of treatment options on QoL, patients can make a more informed decision, ensuring a smoother and more enjoyable journey through the desert of their diagnosis.

Date :
  1. Date Completed 2018-07-24
  2. Date Revised 2022-03-30
Further Info :

Pubmed ID

28757301

DOI: Digital Object Identifier

10.1016/j.eururo.2017.06.035

Related Literature

Article Analysis
・Effective treatment of prostate cancer
SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages

English

Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.

This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.