Paper Details

  1. Home
  2. Paper Details

Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Correction of Poliomyelitis-Related Spinal Deformities: A Comparison Among Three Types of Pelvic Instrumentations.

Author: HuZongshan, LiJie, LiuZhen, QiuYong, TsengChangchun, YuanYiwen, ZhaoZhihui, ZhuZezhang

Comparative StudyResearch that compares multiple groups/interventions to determine differences/similarities in outcomes/characteristics.
Journal ArticleAn article published in an academic or professional journal that reports original research or scholarly analysis.

Overview

This study compared the clinical and radiographic outcomes of corrective surgery in patients with poliomyelitis-related spinal deformity (PSD) using 3 types of pelvic fixation. S2-alar-iliac (S2AI) screw fixation significantly decreased operative time and estimated blood loss compared to the Galveston technique and iliac screw fixation. Patient age at surgery and grade >2 SRS-Schwab osteotomy were significant risk factors for complications.
Paper Details　
Original Abstract of the Article :
BACKGROUND: We compared the clinical and radiographic outcomes of corrective surgery in patients with poliomyelitis-related spinal deformity (PSD) using 3 types of pelvic fixation and investigated the incidence and risk factors for complications. METHODS: We reviewed the data from 42 patients with ...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel IconDr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について

ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。

* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。


引用元：
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2018.10.238

データ提供：米国国立医学図書館（NLM）

Corrective Surgery for Poliomyelitis-Related Spinal Deformities: A Comparative Study

The treatment of [poliomyelitis-related spinal deformities (PSD)] is a complex challenge. This study investigates the outcomes of [corrective surgery] for PSD, comparing three different types of [pelvic instrumentation]. The authors conducted a retrospective analysis of 42 patients who underwent spinopelvic reconstruction, evaluating radiographic parameters, clinical outcomes, and complications. The study demonstrates that all three pelvic instrumentation techniques achieved significant correction of spinal deformities, with varying levels of operative time, blood loss, and complication rates. The authors highlight the importance of choosing the appropriate pelvic instrumentation technique based on individual patient characteristics and surgical considerations.

Finding the Right Path to Spinal Correction

This study offers valuable insights into the complex world of [spinal deformity surgery]. The authors' meticulous analysis of different [pelvic instrumentation] techniques underscores the need for a tailored approach to treatment. This research provides valuable guidance for clinicians seeking to optimize outcomes for patients with PSD.

A Comprehensive Approach to Spinal Deformity Management

This research highlights the importance of a multidisciplinary approach to managing [spinal deformities], involving neurosurgeons, orthopedic surgeons, and other specialists. The authors' study underscores the importance of selecting the most appropriate surgical technique based on individual patient characteristics and surgical considerations.

Dr.Camel's Conclusion

This research is a testament to the progress of [spinal deformity surgery] and the ever-evolving landscape of treatment options. It's like finding the right path through a challenging desert terrain – each patient requires a tailored approach to achieve optimal outcomes. The authors' work provides valuable insights into the complexities of spinal deformity management and underscores the importance of a personalized approach to care.

Date :
  1. Date Completed 2019-02-22
  2. Date Revised 2022-12-07
Further Info :

Pubmed ID

30439526

DOI: Digital Object Identifier

10.1016/j.wneu.2018.10.238

SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages

English

Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.

This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.