Paper Details

  1. Home
  2. Paper Details

Comparing the Real-World Effectiveness of Competing Colonoscopy Preparations: Results of a Prospective Trial.

Author: AlmarioChristopher V, BullenTia, FullerGarth, GuPhillip, HsuKevin, KoJeffrey, LewDaniel, MirakhorEbrahim, OhSun Jung, PattisapuVarun, SpiegelBrennan M R, VipaniAarshi

Comparative StudyResearch that compares multiple groups/interventions to determine differences/similarities in outcomes/characteristics.
Journal ArticleAn article published in an academic or professional journal that reports original research or scholarly analysis.
Research Support, N.I.H., ExtramuralResearch funding provided by the NIH to external research institutions and researchers.
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tResearch funding provided by government agencies outside the United States.

Overview

This study compared the effectiveness of different bowel preparations used for colonoscopy. It aimed to address the lack of comparative effectiveness studies and provide real-world evidence for clinicians to guide their choice of preparations.
Paper Details　
Original Abstract of the Article :
National societies provide little guidance regarding which colonoscopy bowel preps are best tolerated and most effective; this reflects a lack of comparative effectiveness studies that directly evaluate the available preps in a "real-world" setting. To address this gap, we conducted a prospective, c...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel IconDr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について

ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。

* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。


引用元：
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30730859

データ提供：米国国立医学図書館（NLM）

Navigating the Colonoscopy Prep Maze: Finding the Best Route

In the world of [gastroenterology], colonoscopies are a crucial tool for detecting and preventing colorectal cancer. However, the preparation process can be a source of anxiety and discomfort. This study takes us on a quest for the best colonoscopy prep, evaluating the effectiveness and tolerability of various options. Through a [prospective, commercially unfunded comparative effectiveness study], the researchers compared the impact of different bowel preps on the quality of bowel cleansing. Their goal was to shed light on which preps are best tolerated and most effective in real-world settings. This study provides valuable data for healthcare providers and patients, helping them make informed decisions about the preparation process for colonoscopies.

Clearing the Path for Enhanced Colonoscopy Outcomes

The researchers found that different colonoscopy bowel preps exhibit varying levels of effectiveness and tolerability. These findings provide important insights for healthcare providers who are seeking to optimize the preparation process, ensuring a successful colonoscopy experience for patients. The study's findings highlight the importance of conducting comparative effectiveness studies to evaluate the performance of different medical interventions in real-world settings.

Finding the Right Prep for a Smoother Journey

Imagine embarking on a journey through the vast desert of the digestive system. The right colonoscopy prep can make the journey smoother, ensuring a clearer view for the healthcare provider. This study's results can help patients find the prep that best suits their individual needs, making the experience more comfortable and effective. It's like choosing the right camel for a long trek, ensuring a comfortable and successful expedition.

Dr. Camel's Conclusion

The quest for the best colonoscopy prep is akin to finding the most reliable oasis in a vast desert. This study offers valuable insights into the real-world effectiveness of different preps, helping us navigate the terrain of bowel preparation with greater confidence. The study's findings underscore the importance of rigorous research to optimize medical practices and provide patients with the best possible care.

Date :
  1. Date Completed 2019-12-16
  2. Date Revised 2020-03-09
Further Info :

Pubmed ID

30730859

DOI: Digital Object Identifier

NIHMS1522129

Related Literature

Article Analysis
・Effects of polyethylene glycol 3350
SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages

English

Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.

This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.