Paper Details
- Home
- Paper Details
The clinical and cost-effectiveness of total versus partial knee replacement in patients with medial compartment osteoarthritis (TOPKAT): 5-year outcomes of a randomised controlled trial.
Author: , ArdenNigel, BeardDavid J, CampbellHelen, CampbellMarion K, CarrAndrew, CookJonathan A, DaviesLoretta J, FitzpatrickRay, HudsonJemma, KentSeamus, LealJose, MacLennanGraeme, MurrayDavid, PriceAndrew
Original Abstract of the Article :
Late-stage isolated medial knee osteoarthritis can be treated with total knee replacement (TKR) or partial knee replacement (PKR). There is high variation in treatment choice and little robust evidence to guide selection. The Total or Partial Knee Arthroplasty Trial (TOPKAT) therefore aims to assess...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について
ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。
* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。
引用元:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6727069/
データ提供:米国国立医学図書館(NLM)
Total vs. Partial Knee Replacement: A 5-Year Follow-up
This study explores the long-term outcomes of total knee replacement (TKR) versus partial knee replacement (PKR) for medial compartment osteoarthritis. The study, a randomized controlled trial, aims to assess the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of these two surgical approaches over a 5-year period. The study, still ongoing, provides valuable insights into the long-term outcomes of these two procedures, providing valuable information for healthcare providers and patients seeking knee replacement surgery. The study findings will contribute to a more informed understanding of the best treatment option for patients with medial compartment osteoarthritis.Knee Replacement: Making Informed Decisions
This study provides crucial information for patients considering knee replacement surgery for medial compartment osteoarthritis. The research offers a long-term perspective on the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of both total knee replacement (TKR) and partial knee replacement (PKR). This information is essential for making informed decisions about the most suitable treatment option for individual needs and circumstances. The study findings will contribute to a more evidence-based approach to knee replacement surgery, guiding both patients and healthcare providers in making the best choices for optimal outcomes.Navigating the Path to Knee Health
This research provides a valuable roadmap for navigating the complexities of knee replacement surgery. The study, with its long-term follow-up, offers a comprehensive perspective on the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of both total knee replacement (TKR) and partial knee replacement (PKR). This information is crucial for patients seeking to make informed decisions about their knee health. Just as a camel navigates the desert by carefully considering the terrain and its resources, individuals facing knee replacement surgery need to work closely with their healthcare providers to choose the path that best suits their individual needs and circumstances.Dr. Camel's Conclusion
This study is a testament to the ongoing search for better and more effective treatments for orthopedic conditions. The research provides valuable information for patients considering knee replacement surgery, offering a detailed analysis of the long-term outcomes of both total and partial knee replacement. Just as a camel adapts to its environment by finding the best routes and resources, researchers are constantly striving to find the most effective ways to improve the health and well-being of individuals facing orthopedic challenges.Date :
- Date Completed 2019-09-20
- Date Revised 2022-12-14
Further Info :
Related Literature
Article Analysis
SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages
English
Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.
This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.