Paper Details

  1. Home
  2. Paper Details

Qualitative analysis of ward staff experiences during research of a novel suicide-prevention psychological therapy for psychiatric inpatients: Understanding the barriers and facilitators.

Author: ArmitageChristopher J, AwenatYvonne F, GoodingPatricia A, HaddockGillian, HarrisKamelia, HuggettCharlotte, PetersSarah, PrattDaniel

Journal ArticleAn article published in an academic or professional journal that reports original research or scholarly analysis.
Randomized Controlled TrialA clinical trial that randomly assigns participants to treatment and control groups to evaluate the effects of an intervention.
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tResearch funding provided by government agencies outside the United States.

Overview

This qualitative study explores staff experiences and views of a psychological intervention for people with suicidal experiences on psychiatric in-patient wards, highlighting the importance of staff engagement for effective implementation.
Paper Details　
Original Abstract of the Article :
Suicide prevention is a global priority. Psychiatric hospitalization presents an opportunity to intervene positively with, for example, psychological therapies. However, evidenced-based suicide-prevention psychological treatments are rarely available on in-patient wards. Understanding staff engageme...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel IconDr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について

ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。

* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。


引用元：
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6759174/

データ提供：米国国立医学図書館（NLM）

Qualitative Analysis of Ward Staff Experiences During Research of a Novel Suicide-Prevention Psychological Therapy for Psychiatric Inpatients: Understanding the Barriers and Facilitators

Understanding how mental health professionals engage with research on suicide prevention therapies is crucial for their effective implementation. This research, like a camel navigating a vast desert of knowledge, delves into the experiences and perspectives of ward staff during a pilot study of Cognitive Behavioural Suicide Prevention therapy. The authors used qualitative methods to uncover the barriers and facilitators to implementing this intervention, which is important for improving the lives of those struggling with suicidal thoughts.

The Significance of Staff Engagement in Suicide Prevention Research

The study's findings highlight the importance of staff engagement in suicide prevention research. This research, like a beacon in the desert, illuminates a path towards better understanding and treatment of suicidal ideation. This research suggests that staff support and engagement are essential for the successful implementation of evidence-based therapies.

Improving Mental Healthcare and Suicide Prevention Strategies

This research provides valuable insights for improving mental healthcare and suicide prevention strategies. By understanding the complexities of staff engagement in this area, we can create a more supportive and effective environment for those who need it most.

Dr. Camel's Conclusion

This research, like an oasis in the desert, offers a fresh perspective on the complexities of suicide prevention and the vital role of staff engagement. It underscores the importance of addressing the challenges and promoting the facilitators to ensure that evidence-based therapies reach those who need them most. It's a reminder that even in the vast desert of mental health challenges, there's always hope for a brighter future.
Date :
  1. Date Completed 2020-03-16
  2. Date Revised 2023-10-14
Further Info :

Pubmed ID

31550251

DOI: Digital Object Identifier

PMC6759174

Related Literature

Article Analysis
・Effective treatment of suicide
SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages

English

Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.

This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.