Paper Details

  1. Home
  2. Paper Details

Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Common Therapies in Keloids and Hypertrophic Scars: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Author: BaoYawei, DengJixiang, LiXiaojing, LiXinyi, PanFaming, PanZhipeng, XuShanshan

Meta-AnalysisA statistical technique that integrates the results of multiple studies to draw more general conclusions about a particular issue.
Journal ArticleAn article published in an academic or professional journal that reports original research or scholarly analysis.
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tResearch funding provided by government agencies outside the United States.
Systematic ReviewA review that systematically collects, evaluates, and integrates relevant research to answer a specific research question.

Overview

This meta-analysis found that TAC+5-FU may be the most effective therapy for keloids and hypertrophic scars, while verapamil may be a better therapeutic strategy for safety.
Paper Details　
Original Abstract of the Article :
OBJECTIVES: At present, there are many therapies for treating keloids and hypertrophic scars, but there is still a lack of treatments that are relatively balanced in efficacy and safety. The study aims to evaluate comprehensively efficacy and safety of common therapies in keloids and hypertrophic sc...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel IconDr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について

ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。

* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。


引用元：
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-019-01518-y

データ提供：米国国立医学図書館（NLM）

Keloids and Hypertrophic Scars: A Comprehensive Guide to Treatment Options

The study takes a thorough look at the treatment of keloids and hypertrophic scars, which are raised scars that can be unsightly and often cause discomfort. It systematically evaluates the efficacy and safety of various treatment options, offering valuable insights for healthcare providers and patients seeking effective management strategies.

A Desert of Options: Finding the Right Path

The research aims to compare the efficacy and safety of common therapies for keloids and hypertrophic scars, a daunting task akin to navigating a vast desert with numerous paths leading in different directions. The study analyzed data from 17 different therapies, identifying their effectiveness and potential side effects. They found that combination therapies, like a well-stocked camel caravan, were more effective than single-agent therapies. The researchers also found that triamcinolone acetonide (TAC) was less safe than verapamil, a reminder that even in the desert of treatment options, one must choose wisely to minimize risks.

Navigating the Desert: Choosing the Right Treatment

This comprehensive review provides valuable guidance for healthcare providers and patients seeking effective treatment options for keloids and hypertrophic scars. The study highlights the need for careful consideration of the benefits and risks of different therapies, emphasizing the importance of individualizing treatment plans based on the specific needs of each patient. Just as a camel adapts its journey to the terrain, we must adapt our approach to treatment based on the unique challenges presented by each patient's condition.

Dr.Camel's Conclusion

This research offers a valuable roadmap for navigating the complex landscape of keloid and hypertrophic scar treatments. The study's findings provide healthcare providers and patients with essential information to guide treatment decisions, helping them find the most effective and safe path through the desert of options.

Date :
  1. Date Completed 2021-01-06
  2. Date Revised 2022-05-31
Further Info :

Pubmed ID

31637502

DOI: Digital Object Identifier

10.1007/s00266-019-01518-y

Related Literature

Article Analysis
・Effective treatment of scars
SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages

English

Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.

This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.