Comparing the Effectiveness of Cognitive Functional Treatment and Lumbar Stabilization Treatment on Pain and Movement Control in Patients With Low Back Pain.

Author: HadadnezhadMalihe, KhodadadBehrouz, LetafatkarAmir, ShojaedinSadredin

Paper Details 
Original Abstract of the Article :
BACKGROUND: The treatment of chronic low back pain (LBP) should target both behavioral variables and physical performance factors. HYPOTHESIS: Cognitive functional treatment (CFT) and lumbar stabilization treatment (LST) will result in positive changes in pain and lumbar movement control (LMC) in p...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel IconDr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について

ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。

* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。


引用元:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7222662/

データ提供:米国国立医学図書館(NLM)

Cognitive Functional Treatment vs. Lumbar Stabilization Treatment for Chronic Low Back Pain

Chronic low back pain (LBP) is a prevalent and debilitating condition. Finding effective treatment approaches remains a challenge for healthcare professionals. This study compares the effectiveness of two commonly used treatment strategies, cognitive functional treatment (CFT) and lumbar stabilization treatment (LST), in addressing chronic LBP.

Both Treatments Effective, No Clear Superiority

The authors conducted a pretest-posttest intervention study involving patients with chronic LBP. They found that both CFT and LST resulted in significant reductions in pain and improvements in lumbar movement control. However, there was no significant difference in outcomes between the two treatment groups. This suggests that both approaches can be effective for managing chronic LBP.

Navigating the Desert of Pain: Choosing the Right Path

This research, much like a camel choosing a path through a vast and sometimes treacherous desert, highlights the need for individualized approaches to treating chronic LBP. While both CFT and LST can be effective, the best option may vary depending on the individual patient's needs and preferences. This research encourages a personalized approach to chronic LBP management, taking into account the unique factors that contribute to pain and disability in each patient.

Dr. Camel's Conclusion

This research, like a camel navigating a vast and varied desert landscape, reveals that both cognitive functional treatment and lumbar stabilization treatment can be effective in managing chronic low back pain. However, there is no one-size-fits-all approach, and the best treatment option may vary depending on the individual. This research encourages a personalized and holistic approach to managing chronic low back pain, ensuring that patients receive the most appropriate and effective care.

Date :
  1. Date Completed 2020-05-19
  2. Date Revised 2022-04-14
Further Info :

Pubmed ID

31841078

DOI: Digital Object Identifier

PMC7222662

Related Literature

SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages

English

Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.

This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.