Paper Details

  1. Home
  2. Paper Details

A split-face randomized controlled study comparing the efficacy and safety of intralesional radiofrequency-assisted subcision vs conventional subcision in postacne scars.

Author: AravaSudheer, GuptaSomesh, KaurManinder, SethuramanGomathy, SharmaVinod K

Comparative StudyResearch that compares multiple groups/interventions to determine differences/similarities in outcomes/characteristics.
Journal ArticleAn article published in an academic or professional journal that reports original research or scholarly analysis.
Randomized Controlled TrialA clinical trial that randomly assigns participants to treatment and control groups to evaluate the effects of an intervention.

Overview

This study compared the efficacy and safety of radiofrequency-assisted subcision (rSubcision) with conventional subcision for treating postacne scars. Both treatments showed significant improvement in scar appearance, with rSubcision resulting in slightly better patient-reported outcomes. However, rSubcision carries a small risk of burns while conventional subcision has a higher risk of hematoma formation.
Paper Details　
Original Abstract of the Article :
BACKGROUND: Postacne scars have significant psychosocial distress among patients. Subcision is a well-known treatment modality specially for rolling type of acne scars, but is a crude mechanical process, which carries a risk of hematoma formation. AIMS: To compare the efficacy and safety of radiofr...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel IconDr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について

ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。

* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。


引用元：
https://doi.org/10.1111/jocd.13384

データ提供：米国国立医学図書館（NLM）

Radiofrequency-Assisted Subcision: A Promising Approach to Post-Acne Scars

The field of [dermatology] is constantly seeking new ways to treat [post-acne scars]. This research compares the efficacy and safety of [radiofrequency-assisted subcision (rSubcision)] with [conventional subcision] for the treatment of [post-acne scars]. The study utilizes a [split-face randomized controlled study] design and concludes that [rSubcision] shows comparable efficacy to [conventional subcision] with potentially fewer complications.

Radiofrequency-Assisted Subcision: A Potentially Safer Option

The study suggests that [rSubcision] may be a promising alternative to [conventional subcision] for the treatment of [post-acne scars]. The potential reduction in complications associated with [rSubcision] is encouraging, offering hope for patients seeking a more comfortable and effective treatment option. The results highlight the importance of further research to fully understand the long-term outcomes of [rSubcision] compared to [conventional subcision].

Managing Post-Acne Scars: A Multifaceted Approach

The study underscores the importance of considering a variety of treatment options for [post-acne scars]. This may include [non-invasive] approaches, [laser therapies], and [dermal fillers] in addition to [subcision]. Like a desert traveler seeking the best path to their destination, patients need to work with their dermatologists to find the most appropriate and effective treatment for their individual needs.

Dr.Camel's Conclusion

This research highlights the potential of [rSubcision] as a viable treatment option for [post-acne scars]. The study encourages further research into the long-term outcomes of [rSubcision] and its potential benefits compared to [conventional subcision]. It's a reminder that the quest for smooth and clear skin can be a journey with many paths, but with careful consideration and collaboration with dermatologists, we can find the best route to success.

Date :
  1. Date Completed 2021-02-08
  2. Date Revised 2021-02-08
Further Info :

Pubmed ID

32233007

DOI: Digital Object Identifier

10.1111/jocd.13384

Related Literature

Article Analysis
・Effective treatment of scars
SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages

English

Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.

This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.