Paper Details

  1. Home
  2. Paper Details

Comparison of Intralesional Measles, Mumps, Rubella Vaccine and Needling in the Treatment of Recurrent Warts.

Author: KolteSurabhi R, SardesaiVidyadhar R

Journal ArticleAn article published in an academic or professional journal that reports original research or scholarly analysis.

Overview

This study compared the efficacy of intralesional measles, mumps, rubella (MMR) vaccine and needling in the treatment of recurrent warts. The study found that needling was a better treatment modality than intralesional MMR vaccine at the end of 4 and 6 weeks.
Paper Details　
Original Abstract of the Article :
CONTEXT: Warts constitute 21% of all the cases in a dermatology clinic. Their causative agent is the human papillomavirus (HPV). Most of the cutaneous warts are cosmetically disfiguring and their treatment requires patience by both the practitioner and the patients. AIM: This study aimed to compare...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel IconDr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について

ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。

* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。


引用元：
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7646425/

データ提供：米国国立医学図書館（NLM）

Warts: A Desert of Frustration

The world of dermatology is filled with frustrating conditions, and warts are a common thorn in the side of many patients. This study compares the efficacy of two treatments for recurrent warts: intralesional measles, mumps, rubella (MMR) vaccine and needling. Like a camel trying to navigate a desert filled with prickly thorns, researchers sought the most effective way to clear these persistent skin lesions.

Needling Emerges as a Winner

The research, like a skilled desert navigator, found that needling proved to be a more effective treatment modality for recurrent warts compared to intralesional MMR vaccine. Needling demonstrated statistically significant results in clearing warts after 4 and 6 weeks. This study suggests that needling may be a valuable option for patients seeking a faster and more effective treatment for recurrent warts.

Seeking Solutions: A Camel's Perspective

The desert of warts can be a frustrating experience, but this study offers a promising solution. Needling seems to be a more effective approach compared to intralesional MMR vaccine, providing a faster and more efficient way to clear these persistent lesions. It's essential to consult with a dermatologist to determine the best treatment plan based on individual needs and medical history.

Dr.Camel's Conclusion

This study reveals that needling is a more effective treatment modality for recurrent warts compared to intralesional MMR vaccine. This finding offers a valuable option for patients seeking faster and more efficient wart clearance. Just as a camel uses its sharp hooves to navigate the desert terrain, needling may be a key tool for tackling these persistent skin lesions.

Date :
  1. Date Completed n.d.
  2. Date Revised 2022-04-18
Further Info :

Pubmed ID

33208998

DOI: Digital Object Identifier

PMC7646425

Related Literature

Article Analysis
・Effective treatment of rubella
SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages

English

Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.

This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.