Paper Details

  1. Home
  2. Paper Details

Clinical practice guidelines for the treatment and management of low back pain: A systematic review of quantity and quality.

Author: AzizudinAshlee M, MohiuddinUzair, NgJeremy Y

Journal ArticleAn article published in an academic or professional journal that reports original research or scholarly analysis.
ReviewAn article that critically examines existing research on a particular topic and summarizes the current state of knowledge in the field.
Systematic ReviewA review that systematically collects, evaluates, and integrates relevant research to answer a specific research question.

Overview

This review assessed the quality of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for the treatment and/or management of low back pain (LBP) in adults. The review found that CPGs varied in quality, with most scoring highest in scope and purpose and clarity of presentation. The review suggests that CPGs with higher AGREE II scores can serve as reliable evidence-based resources for clinicians involved in LBP care, while those with lower scores should be improved in future updates.
Paper Details　
Original Abstract of the Article :
BACKGROUND: Low back pain (LBP) is highly prevalent in the general population and is responsible for increased health-care costs, pain, impairment of activity, and if chronic, is associated with a range of comorbidities. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this review was to identify the quantity and assess...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel IconDr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について

ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。

* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。


引用元：
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msksp.2020.102295

データ提供：米国国立医学図書館（NLM）

Evaluating the Evidence Behind Low Back Pain Treatment Guidelines

Low back pain is a common ailment that affects millions of people around the world. Navigating the vast landscape of treatment options can be challenging, which is why researchers are constantly striving to develop clear and evidence-based guidelines for clinicians. This particular study set out to evaluate the quality of existing clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for the treatment of low back pain. The authors used a systematic review to assess the quantity and quality of evidence behind these guidelines, analyzing them based on six key domains. Their findings provide valuable insights into the strengths and weaknesses of existing CPGs, highlighting areas where further research and refinement are needed.

The Quality of Clinical Practice Guidelines for Low Back Pain

This study reveals that while some CPGs for low back pain demonstrate high quality in terms of clarity of presentation and scope, they fall short in other areas such as stakeholder involvement and rigour of development. The study also found a significant variation in quality across different guidelines, suggesting a need for standardization and improved consistency in the development and implementation of CPGs.

Finding the Right Treatment for Low Back Pain

As a doctor, I understand how frustrating it can be for patients to experience low back pain. This study is an important step toward ensuring that patients receive the most effective and evidence-based care. It's crucial for clinicians to stay updated on the latest CPGs and to use those that are most comprehensive and rigorously developed. By doing so, we can provide patients with the best possible treatment and improve their overall quality of life.

Dr.Camel's Conclusion

Imagine a vast desert with a network of paths leading in different directions. This study is like a guide, helping us determine which paths are clear, well-maintained, and lead to the best destinations. It's important to follow the most reliable and well-established paths to ensure the best outcomes for patients suffering from low back pain.

Date :
  1. Date Completed 2021-09-29
  2. Date Revised 2022-05-31
Further Info :

Pubmed ID

33444892

DOI: Digital Object Identifier

10.1016/j.msksp.2020.102295

Related Literature

Article Analysis
・Effective treatment of back pain
SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages

English

Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.

This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.