Paper Details

  1. Home
  2. Paper Details

Evaluation of ICCMS versus CAMBRA Caries Risk Assessment Models Acquisition on Treatment Plan in Young Adult Population: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Author: HafezShereen, KhallafYomna Sayed, ShaalanOmar Osama

Case ReportsIn the medical field, a report that describes in detail a unique case, an unusual medical condition, or the effect of a treatment. Provides new insights and possibilities for treatment through individual patient cases.
Clinical TrialA clinical trial is a planned study conducted on humans to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pharmaceuticals, medical devices, and treatment methods. It aims to explore the possibilities of new treatments and improve the health of patients.

Overview

ICCMS and CAMBRA models are equivalent in preventing new decay. ICCMS is simpler but less comprehensive, while CAMBRA is more comprehensive but may have side effects.
Paper Details　
Original Abstract of the Article :
PURPOSE: To evaluate the difference between ICCMS and CAMBRA models on treatment plan of young adults. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: A total of 104 young adult patients were randomly divided into two groups, either ICCMS or CAMBRA. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were examined according to the criteria of t...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel IconDr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について

ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。

* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。


引用元：
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8289689/

データ提供：米国国立医学図書館（NLM）

Evaluation of ICCMS versus CAMBRA Caries Risk Assessment Models Acquisition on Treatment Plan in Young Adult Population

Dental caries, or tooth decay, is a common problem, particularly among young adults. This study compared two different caries risk assessment models, ICCMS and CAMBRA, to see how they affected treatment plans for young adults.

Assessing Caries Risk: A Tale of Two Models

The study, involving 104 young adult patients, found no statistically significant difference between the two models in terms of treatment plan effectiveness. While both models were effective, the study found that CAMBRA offered a simpler approach while ICCMS provided more comprehensive information. The authors also highlighted the importance of considering accessibility and potential side effects of treatment products when choosing a model.

Prevention and Management of Tooth Decay: A Desert of Dental Health

Maintaining good oral health is a lifelong journey, akin to a camel traversing a desert landscape. This study provides valuable insights into the potential of different approaches to assess and manage dental caries. It highlights the importance of understanding the nuances of each model and choosing the one best suited for individual needs.

Dr.Camel's Conclusion

This study delves into the world of caries risk assessment, a crucial aspect of maintaining oral health. Like a camel navigating the diverse landscape of the desert, we must carefully consider the various approaches available for assessing and managing dental caries. Understanding the strengths and limitations of different models helps us make informed choices to ensure healthy smiles for our patients.

Date :
  1. Date Completed n.d.
  2. Date Revised 2022-04-25
Further Info :

Pubmed ID

34290532

DOI: Digital Object Identifier

PMC8289689

Related Literature

Article Analysis
・Side Effects of fluoride
SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages

English

Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.

This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.