Paper Details

  1. Home
  2. Paper Details

Symptom improvement and remission in untreated adults seeking treatment for obsessive-compulsive disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Author: DearBlake F, KarinEyal, McDonaldSarah, MelkonianMaral, ScottAmelia, WoottonBethany M

Journal ArticleAn article published in an academic or professional journal that reports original research or scholarly analysis.
Meta-AnalysisA statistical technique that integrates the results of multiple studies to draw more general conclusions about a particular issue.
ReviewAn article that critically examines existing research on a particular topic and summarizes the current state of knowledge in the field.
Systematic ReviewA review that systematically collects, evaluates, and integrates relevant research to answer a specific research question.
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tResearch funding provided by government agencies outside the United States.

Overview

This study examined the course of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) in people who didn't receive treatment, using data from control groups in clinical trials. The findings showed that, without treatment, OCD symptoms generally didn't improve significantly over an average of 10.9 weeks, and only 4% of participants saw their symptoms completely disappear. The study suggests that OCD, without treatment, is a chronic and persistent condition.
Paper Details　
Original Abstract of the Article :
Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is a common psychiatric condition that results in significant distress and impairment, and high societal costs. OCD is widely considered to be a chronic condition, however, our understanding of the chronicity of the disorder, and the incidence of spontaneous remis...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel IconDr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について

ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。

* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。


引用元：
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2022.08.037

データ提供：米国国立医学図書館（NLM）

The Long and Winding Road of OCD: A Meta-Analysis on Untreated Cases

The field of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) research is a vast desert, and we're constantly searching for new ways to navigate its complexities. This study, like a trusty camel caravan, embarks on a journey to explore the natural course of OCD without treatment. Through a meta-analysis, the researchers pooled data from twelve studies, effectively creating a giant, panoramic view of the landscape of OCD. They discovered that, without treatment, OCD often remains a chronic condition, with only a tiny percentage of individuals showing spontaneous remission.

The Unrelenting Nature of OCD: Evidence From the Meta-Analysis

The meta-analysis revealed that the average effect size for symptom improvement in untreated OCD was negligible, indicating a slow, if any, natural change. The rate of spontaneous remission was also very low, with only 4% of participants achieving remission over an average of 10.92 weeks. These findings reinforce the notion that OCD, left untreated, can be a challenging and persistent condition.

A Journey Through the Desert: Navigating the Reality of OCD

This research paints a realistic picture of the journey through OCD, reminding us that without treatment, the desert of symptoms can be vast and daunting. It highlights the importance of seeking timely and appropriate treatment for OCD, as early intervention can greatly improve the chances of navigating this challenging landscape.

Dr. Camel's Conclusion

This meta-analysis sheds light on the chronic nature of OCD without treatment, serving as a reminder of the importance of early intervention and tailored treatment approaches. Like a camel, OCD requires a patient and persistent approach, but with the right tools and support, we can navigate this challenging terrain and achieve meaningful improvements.

Date :
  1. Date Completed 2022-09-29
  2. Date Revised 2022-10-19
Further Info :

Pubmed ID

36030999

DOI: Digital Object Identifier

10.1016/j.jad.2022.08.037

SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages

English

Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.

This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.