Paper Details

  1. Home
  2. Paper Details

Racial disparities in uterine fibroids and endometriosis: a systematic review and application of social, structural, and political context.

Author: KatonJodie G, MarshErica E, PlowdenTorie C

Systematic ReviewA review that systematically collects, evaluates, and integrates relevant research to answer a specific research question.
Journal ArticleAn article published in an academic or professional journal that reports original research or scholarly analysis.
Research Support, N.I.H., ExtramuralResearch funding provided by the NIH to external research institutions and researchers.

Overview

A systematic review of the literature found that the prevalence of uterine fibroids is consistently higher in Black than in White women in the United States. This disparity is linked to differential exposures to suspected etiologic agents, lack of adequate access to healthcare, and bias and discrimination within the healthcare system. Data on endometriosis were less clear, but Black women with fibroids or endometriosis experience worse clinical and surgical outcomes than their White counterparts.
Paper Details　
Original Abstract of the Article :
IMPORTANCE: Uterine fibroids and endometriosis are 2 of the leading causes of morbidity among reproductive-aged women. There are significant racial disparities in disease prevalence, incidence, age of onset, and treatment profile in fibroids. The data on endometriosis are less clear. OBJECTIVE: To ...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel IconDr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について

ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。

* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。


引用元：
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36682686

データ提供：米国国立医学図書館（NLM）

Racial Disparities in Uterine Fibroids and Endometriosis: A Call for Equity

This research delves into the crucial topic of racial disparities in gynecologic health, focusing on uterine fibroids and endometriosis. The study found that Black women experience significantly higher rates of uterine fibroids compared to White women, with the disparities attributed to a complex interplay of social, structural, and political factors. The research underscores the need for systemic change to address these disparities and ensure equitable access to healthcare for all women. This study is like uncovering a hidden canyon in the desert, revealing the deep-rooted inequalities that exist within our society.

Addressing the Root Causes of Health Disparities

The study highlights the importance of addressing the root causes of health disparities, which are often rooted in social, structural, and political factors. The findings call for a multifaceted approach to improving healthcare equity, including addressing systemic bias, promoting culturally competent care, and ensuring equitable access to quality healthcare for all.

A Call for Action: Promoting Health Equity for All

This research emphasizes the urgency of addressing racial disparities in healthcare. The findings serve as a powerful reminder that achieving health equity requires a concerted effort to dismantle systemic barriers and promote equitable access to care for all individuals, regardless of race or socioeconomic status.

Dr.Camel's Conclusion

This study sheds light on the profound impact of systemic inequalities on women's health. Like a desert oasis that is threatened by drought, the health of Black women is under stress due to a lack of equitable access to care. This research serves as a call to action to address the root causes of these disparities and build a more just and equitable healthcare system for all.

Date :
  1. Date Completed 2023-03-06
  2. Date Revised 2023-03-09
Further Info :

Pubmed ID

36682686

DOI: Digital Object Identifier

NIHMS1871652

SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages

English

Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.

This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.