Paper Details

  1. Home
  2. Paper Details

Intracytoplasmic sperm injection versus conventional in vitro fertilisation in couples with males presenting with normal total sperm count and motility.

Author: CuttingElizabeth, DangVinh, HortaFabrizzio, MolBen Willem J, van RumsteMinouche Me

Journal ArticleAn article published in an academic or professional journal that reports original research or scholarly analysis.
ReviewAn article that critically examines existing research on a particular topic and summarizes the current state of knowledge in the field.
Systematic ReviewA review that systematically collects, evaluates, and integrates relevant research to answer a specific research question.
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tResearch funding provided by government agencies outside the United States.

Overview

This review updated a previous review comparing intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) with conventional in vitro fertilisation (c-IVF) for couples with males presenting with normal total sperm count and motility.
Paper Details　
Original Abstract of the Article :
Starting over 40 years ago, in vitro fertilisation (IVF) has become the cornerstone for fertility treatment. Since then, in 1992, Palermo and colleagues successfully applied the technique intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) to benefit couples where conventional in vitro fertilisation (c-IVF) and...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel IconDr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について

ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。

* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。


引用元：
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10426261/

データ提供：米国国立医学図書館（NLM）

ICSI vs. IVF: A New Light on Male Infertility

[Infertility] is a complex issue affecting millions of couples worldwide, like a vast and lonely desert. This research explores the use of [intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI)] versus [conventional in vitro fertilization (c-IVF)] for couples with males presenting with normal total sperm count and motility.

ICSI: A Powerful Tool for Male Factor Infertility

The review suggests that [ICSI may be a viable treatment option for couples with unexplained or mild male factor infertility], even in cases where sperm count and motility are considered normal. This discovery could [expand the possibilities for successful conception] for many couples struggling with infertility.

Personalized Approaches to Fertility Treatment

This review underscores the importance of [personalized approaches to fertility treatment], considering the unique circumstances of each couple. It highlights the need for [open communication and careful evaluation] of different treatment options to ensure the best possible outcomes for each individual.

Dr. Camel's Conclusion

This review provides a valuable update on the evolving landscape of infertility treatment. Like a new oasis discovered in the desert, ICSI offers hope and opportunity for couples facing challenges with infertility. By considering all options and working closely with healthcare professionals, couples can find a path to achieve their dream of parenthood.

Date :
  1. Date Completed 2023-08-16
  2. Date Revised 2023-10-28
Further Info :

Pubmed ID

37581383

DOI: Digital Object Identifier

PMC10426261

Related Literature

Article Analysis
・Effective treatment of infertility
SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages

English

Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.

This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.