Adjuvant CMFP versus CMFP plus tamoxifen versus observation alone in postmenopausal, node-positive breast cancer patients: three-year results of an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group study.

Author: BennettJ M, CarboneP P, CummingsF, FalksonG, KalishL A, OlsonJ E, TaylorS G, TormeyD C

Paper Details 
Original Abstract of the Article :
After mastectomy, 265 postmenopausal patients with node-positive breast cancer were stratified according to pathologic nodal status and estrogen-receptor (ER) status and randomized to receive either 12 cycles of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil, and prednisone (CMFP), or CMFP plus tamo...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel IconDr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について

ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。

* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。


引用元:
https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.1985.3.2.144

データ提供:米国国立医学図書館(NLM)

A Comprehensive Look at Postmenopausal Breast Cancer Treatment

This study delves into the world of postmenopausal breast cancer, a challenging condition that requires a multifaceted approach. It focuses on comparing three treatment strategies: adjuvant CMFP (cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil, and prednisone) alone, CMFP plus tamoxifen, and observation alone. The researchers, like desert explorers seeking the best route, meticulously analyzed the data from a large group of patients. They employed Cox regression analysis, a powerful tool for unraveling the relationships between treatment and outcomes. The study's findings, like oases in the desert, offer valuable insights into the effectiveness of these treatments.

Chemotherapy: A Strong Contender in the Fight Against Relapse

The study revealed that chemotherapy, whether CMFP or CMFPT, significantly reduced the risk of relapse during the first year. This is a significant victory in the battle against this disease. However, as time went on, the difference in relapse-free survival between the treatment groups diminished. By the third year, the observation group and chemotherapy groups were comparable in terms of disease-free survival. This suggests that the initial benefits of chemotherapy may wane over time, a finding that requires further investigation.

The Role of Tamoxifen: An Unclear Picture

Intriguingly, the addition of tamoxifen to chemotherapy did not demonstrate any clear benefit or harm, regardless of the prognostic factors analyzed. This finding, like a desert mirage, raises further questions about the role of tamoxifen in this specific context. It emphasizes the need for more research to understand the optimal use of this drug in postmenopausal breast cancer patients.

Dr. Camel's Conclusion

This study provides valuable insights into the complexities of postmenopausal breast cancer treatment. While chemotherapy offers a significant early advantage, the long-term impact needs further evaluation. The role of tamoxifen in this setting remains uncertain and warrants further investigation. It is important to remember that every patient is unique, and the best treatment approach should be tailored to their individual circumstances. This research, like a guiding star in the desert, helps us navigate the complexities of breast cancer treatment and find the best path forward.

Date :
  1. Date Completed 1985-03-11
  2. Date Revised 2017-02-10
Further Info :

Pubmed ID

3881561

DOI: Digital Object Identifier

10.1200/JCO.1985.3.2.144

Related Literature

SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages

English

Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.

This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.