Double-blind evaluation of glucagon and propantheline bromide (pro-banthine) for hypotonic duodenography.

Author: BertrandG, LinscheerW G, RahejaK L, WoodsR F

Paper Details 
Original Abstract of the Article :
The hypotonic effect of glucagon (2 mg) and propantheline bromide (Pro-Banthine, 30 mg) on the upper gastrointestinal tract was compared in a double-blind study in 12 healthy volunteers and 36 patients. The solvent solution for the two drugs was used as a placebo. Both drugs and placebo were adminis...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel IconDr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について

ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。

* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。


引用元:
https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.128.2.197

データ提供:米国国立医学図書館(NLM)

Glucagon vs. Propantheline Bromide for Hypotonic Duodenography: A Double-Blind Comparison

This study, like a desert explorer testing different approaches to navigate a challenging terrain, compares the effectiveness of glucagon and propantheline bromide for inducing hypotonia in the upper gastrointestinal tract. The researchers conducted a double-blind study, administering these medications to healthy volunteers and patients, to assess their hypotonic effects and side effects. The study found that glucagon was more effective than propantheline bromide, with a shorter duration of action and fewer side effects.

Glucagon: A More Effective and Safer Option for Hypotonic Duodenography

This study, like a camel caravan choosing the most reliable path, highlights the advantages of glucagon over propantheline bromide for inducing hypotonia in the upper gastrointestinal tract. The researchers found that glucagon was more effective, with a shorter duration of action and fewer side effects, making it a potentially safer and more efficient option for patients. It's a valuable insight for clinicians seeking the most effective and well-tolerated treatment options for their patients.

Navigating the Gastrointestinal Tract: A Focus on Safety and Efficiency

This study, like a desert physician carefully selecting the best treatment for a patient, emphasizes the importance of choosing the most appropriate and safe approach for procedures involving the gastrointestinal tract. The research highlights the need for careful consideration of both effectiveness and side effects, prioritizing patient safety and well-being. It's a reminder that when it comes to our health, choosing the right treatment is paramount.

Dr. Camel's Conclusion

This study demonstrates the advantages of glucagon over propantheline bromide for inducing hypotonia in the upper gastrointestinal tract. The findings suggest that glucagon is a potentially safer and more effective option, offering valuable insights for clinicians seeking to optimize treatment outcomes for their patients. It's a reminder that choosing the right treatment approach can significantly impact patient experience and well-being.

Date :
  1. Date Completed 1977-02-24
  2. Date Revised 2016-11-23
Further Info :

Pubmed ID

401600

DOI: Digital Object Identifier

10.2214/ajr.128.2.197

Related Literature

SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages

English

Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.

This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.