[Clinical trial in couples of effectiveness and side-effects of gold and D-penicillamine in long term treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (author's transl)].

Author: DrewsJ, HerrlingerJ D, HölscherF, KriegelW, SchmidtR

Paper Details 
Original Abstract of the Article :
A prospective clinical trial in couples was done to compare effectiveness and toxicity of gold and D-penicillamine (D-Pen.) in treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (r.A.). Respecting defined criteria 70 patients were put to couples according to a random list and were treated with gold or D-Pen. alterna...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel IconDr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について

ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。

* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。


引用元:
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01491105

データ提供:米国国立医学図書館(NLM)

Comparing the Effectiveness of Gold and D-penicillamine in Treating Rheumatoid Arthritis

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA), a chronic autoimmune disease, can be a challenging condition to navigate. This research delves into the effectiveness of gold and D-penicillamine, two commonly used medications for treating RA. The researchers conducted a prospective clinical trial in couples, comparing the effectiveness and toxicity of these treatments over an extended period. This study offers valuable insights into the comparative efficacy of these two medications in managing RA, highlighting their strengths and weaknesses.

Gold vs. D-penicillamine in RA: A Comparative Analysis of Effectiveness and Toxicity

The study revealed that gold exhibited superior efficacy compared to D-penicillamine in the long-term treatment of RA, especially in terms of clinical outcomes. However, D-penicillamine showed some advantages in terms of laboratory parameters, while gold exhibited a lower rate of radiographic deterioration. Both medications exhibited comparable side effect frequencies, but the complications associated with D-penicillamine were more serious. This study provides valuable information for healthcare professionals in choosing an appropriate treatment regimen for RA, balancing the benefits and risks of each medication.

Navigating the Landscape of RA Treatment

This research highlights the importance of carefully weighing the benefits and risks of different treatment options for RA. The study suggests that while gold may be more effective in terms of clinical outcomes, D-penicillamine might be more favorable in terms of certain laboratory parameters. It's crucial to consult with a healthcare professional to determine the best treatment approach for your individual needs. This study provides valuable insights into the complexities of RA treatment and the importance of individualized care.

Dr. Camel's Conclusion

This research is a testament to the ongoing quest for better treatments for RA. It provides valuable insights into the comparative efficacy of gold and D-penicillamine, helping healthcare professionals make informed decisions. The desert of RA can be a challenging landscape to navigate, but this research offers valuable guidance, emphasizing the importance of personalized care and ongoing research in finding effective treatments for this debilitating disease.

Date :
  1. Date Completed 1981-03-27
  2. Date Revised 2019-07-11
Further Info :

Pubmed ID

7005521

DOI: Digital Object Identifier

10.1007/BF01491105

Related Literature

SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages

German

Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.

This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.