Paper Details

  1. Home
  2. Paper Details

A comparison of cefaclor versus trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole combination in the treatment of acute urinary infections.

Author: RousS N

Clinical TrialA clinical trial is a planned study conducted on humans to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pharmaceuticals, medical devices, and treatment methods. It aims to explore the possibilities of new treatments and improve the health of patients.
Comparative StudyResearch that compares multiple groups/interventions to determine differences/similarities in outcomes/characteristics.
Journal ArticleAn article published in an academic or professional journal that reports original research or scholarly analysis.
Randomized Controlled TrialA clinical trial that randomly assigns participants to treatment and control groups to evaluate the effects of an intervention.

Overview

Cefaclor was as effective as trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole in treating urinary tract infections in 57 women (100% sterile urine during and after treatment), with no significant side effects.
Paper Details　
Original Abstract of the Article :
Acute lower urinary tract infections were treated in 57 women according to a randomized protocol, using either cefaclor, a cephalosporin whose chemical structure is similar to that of cephalexin, or trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole combination. Urine cultures were made before treatment was started, mid...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel IconDr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について

ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。

* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。


引用元：
https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(17)54981-2

データ提供：米国国立医学図書館（NLM）

Treating Urinary Tract Infections: A Comparison of Cefaclor and Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole

Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are a common health concern, especially among women. This research examines the effectiveness of two antibiotics, cefaclor and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, in treating acute urinary tract infections. The authors conducted a [Randomized Study] to compare the efficacy and safety of these medications, evaluating their impact on bacterial eradication and side effects.

Effective Treatment Options: Cefaclor Shows Promise for UTI Management

This study demonstrates that both cefaclor and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole are effective in treating acute urinary tract infections. The authors found no significant difference in efficacy between the two medications, suggesting that cefaclor is a viable alternative to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. The study also highlights the safety of cefaclor, with fewer side effects reported compared to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole.

Navigating UTI Treatment: Choosing the Right Antibiotic

This study provides valuable information for healthcare providers in selecting effective and safe antibiotics for treating UTIs. The findings suggest that cefaclor is a promising alternative to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, offering comparable efficacy with fewer side effects. This research encourages a more nuanced approach to UTI management, considering individual patient needs and preferences when choosing antibiotics.

Dr.Camel's Conclusion

Just like a camel navigating a treacherous desert, individuals experiencing a UTI may feel lost and uncomfortable. This study offers a helpful guide, comparing the effectiveness of two common antibiotics for treating UTIs. The authors' research underscores the importance of choosing the right antibiotic for each patient, ensuring safe and effective treatment.

Date :
  1. Date Completed 1981-05-13
  2. Date Revised 2019-06-21
Further Info :

Pubmed ID

7009887

DOI: Digital Object Identifier

10.1016/s0022-5347(17)54981-2

Related Literature

Article Analysis
・Side Effects of cephalexin
SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages

English

Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.

This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.