Paper Details

  1. Home
  2. Paper Details

Spinal manipulation vs. amitriptyline for the treatment of chronic tension-type headaches: a randomized clinical trial.

Author: AndersonA V, BolineP D, BronfortG, KassakK, NelsonC

Clinical TrialA clinical trial is a planned study conducted on humans to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pharmaceuticals, medical devices, and treatment methods. It aims to explore the possibilities of new treatments and improve the health of patients.
Comparative StudyResearch that compares multiple groups/interventions to determine differences/similarities in outcomes/characteristics.
Journal ArticleAn article published in an academic or professional journal that reports original research or scholarly analysis.
Randomized Controlled TrialA clinical trial that randomly assigns participants to treatment and control groups to evaluate the effects of an intervention.
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tResearch funding provided by government agencies outside the United States.

Overview

Spinal manipulative therapy was an effective treatment for tension headaches, with sustained therapeutic benefit after treatment cessation. Amitriptyline therapy was slightly more effective in reducing pain during treatment but was associated with more side effects.
Paper Details　
Original Abstract of the Article :
OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of spinal manipulation and pharmaceutical treatment (amitriptyline) for chronic tension-type headache. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial using two parallel groups. The study consisted of a 2-wk baseline period, a 6-wk treatment period and a 4-wk posttreatme...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel IconDr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について

ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。

* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。


引用元：
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7790794

データ提供：米国国立医学図書館（NLM）

Spinal Manipulation vs. Amitriptyline: A Comparative Study for Tension Headaches

This research explores the comparative effectiveness of two common treatment modalities for chronic tension-type headaches: spinal manipulation and amitriptyline. The study utilizes [methodology] to evaluate [research subject] . The findings suggest that both spinal manipulation and amitriptyline are [discovery] for [research subject] , however, spinal manipulation shows [benefit] over amitriptyline.

Spinal Manipulation: A Viable Option for Chronic Tension Headaches

The study highlights the potential of spinal manipulation as a safe and effective treatment option for chronic tension-type headaches. The findings suggest that [treatment] can [benefit] . This research underscores the [benefit] of [treatment] for [research subject] .

Choosing the Right Treatment for Tension Headaches

This research emphasizes the importance of considering the individual needs and preferences of patients when choosing a treatment for chronic tension-type headaches. The study's findings suggest that [treatment] can [benefit] . This research is [benefit] for [research subject] .

Dr.Camel's Conclusion

This study provides valuable insights into the comparative effectiveness of spinal manipulation and amitriptyline for chronic tension-type headaches. The findings suggest that spinal manipulation may offer a more sustainable and less side-effect-prone option for managing this common condition. As Dr. Camel always says, "Just like a camel can endure long journeys through the desert, patients with chronic tension headaches can find relief through a variety of treatment approaches."
Date :
  1. Date Completed 1995-07-26
  2. Date Revised 2013-11-21
Further Info :

Pubmed ID

7790794

DOI: Digital Object Identifier

7790794

SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages

English

Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.

This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.