Paper Details 
Original Abstract of the Article :
Previous research has shown that the differential development of tolerance to the disruption of operant responding produced by repeated dosing with pimozide (PMZ) or clozapine (CLZ) can distinguish these two drugs. In the present study, the effects of PMZ (1 mg/kg) and CLZ (10 mg/kg) on response rat...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel IconDr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について

ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。

* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。


引用元:
https://doi.org/10.1016/0091-3057(94)90524-x

データ提供:米国国立医学図書館(NLM)

The Impact of Clozapine and Pimozide on Operant Responding

The field of [pharmacology] is constantly seeking to understand the intricate mechanisms of how drugs interact with the brain and body. This research dives into the world of [neuroleptics] – medications used to treat mental health conditions. The study focused on comparing the effects of two neuroleptics, clozapine (CLZ) and pimozide (PMZ), on the behavior of rats performing tasks for food rewards. The researchers used a clever technique called [fixed-ratio operant schedule], where rats had to press a lever a certain number of times to receive a reward. This allowed them to measure how the drugs affected the rate and duration of the rats' responses.

The Tale of Two Neuroleptics

The researchers observed that PMZ consistently suppressed the rats' response rates throughout the study. This is like a camel struggling to cross a vast, scorching desert – the PMZ seemed to make the task a little more difficult. On the other hand, CLZ had a different effect – it initially reduced the response rate but then partially recovered over time. This is like a camel, once it's found an oasis, eventually regaining its energy and continuing the journey. PMZ also led to a prolonged increase in response duration, even after the drug was stopped, suggesting that the drug's effects lingered. CLZ did not show the same effects on response duration.

What Does This Mean for Us?

These fascinating findings suggest that the changes in response duration might be a more reliable indicator for differentiating between typical and atypical neuroleptics. This is valuable knowledge for researchers studying these types of drugs. It could potentially lead to more effective treatments in the future.

Dr.Camel's Conclusion

This research, like a desert oasis, provides us with refreshing insights into the complex world of neuroleptics. It highlights the importance of considering not just the rate but also the duration of responses when studying the effects of these drugs. The findings may have significant implications for developing better therapeutic strategies for mental health conditions.

Date :
  1. Date Completed 1994-08-10
  2. Date Revised 2019-07-12
Further Info :

Pubmed ID

8029297

DOI: Digital Object Identifier

10.1016/0091-3057(94)90524-x

Related Literature

Article Analysis
SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages

English

Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.

This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.