Global measures of outcome in a controlled comparison of pharmacological and psychological treatment of panic disorder and agoraphobia in primary care.

Author: AnsteeJ A, PowerK G, SharpD M, SimpsonR J, SwansonV

Paper Details 
Original Abstract of the Article :
Panic disorder, with and without agoraphobia, is a prevalent condition which presents primarily in general practice. Previous clinical outcome studies have been conducted mainly in specialist university departments or hospital settings, and have tended to employ complex rating scales that are not we...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel IconDr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について

ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。

* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。


引用元:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1312921/

データ提供:米国国立医学図書館(NLM)

Assessing the Effectiveness of Pharmacological and Psychological Treatment for Panic Disorder

This research investigates the effectiveness of different treatment approaches for [Panic Disorder and Agoraphobia], a common condition that often presents in [Primary Care Settings]. The study compares the outcomes of [Pharmacological Treatment] and [Psychological Treatment] in a controlled setting, using [Simplified Outcome Measures] appropriate for primary care. The authors aim to provide a comprehensive assessment of the relative effectiveness of these treatment modalities in a primary care setting.

Pharmacological and Psychological Treatment Show Comparable Effectiveness

This study reveals that both [Pharmacological Treatment] and [Psychological Treatment] can be effective in managing [Panic Disorder and Agoraphobia]. The researchers found no significant difference in the overall outcomes between the two treatment groups, suggesting that either approach can be a viable option for patients in primary care. These findings contribute to the growing body of evidence supporting the use of both pharmacological and psychological therapies in managing anxiety disorders.

Implications for Treatment of Panic Disorder in Primary Care

This research highlights the importance of considering both [Pharmacological and Psychological Treatment Options] for patients with [Panic Disorder and Agoraphobia] in primary care settings. The study underscores the need for [Individualized Treatment Plans] that take into account the specific needs and preferences of each patient. By offering a range of treatment options, healthcare providers can provide more effective and personalized care for individuals struggling with anxiety disorders.

Dr. Camel's Conclusion

This study is a reminder that the treatment of mental health conditions is often a journey with many paths. Like a skilled camel navigating the intricate pathways of the desert, healthcare providers must be prepared to offer a variety of treatment options to meet the unique needs of their patients. The findings of this study provide valuable guidance for managing panic disorder in primary care settings, promoting better outcomes and improving the lives of those affected by this debilitating condition.
Date :
  1. Date Completed 1997-06-18
  2. Date Revised 2022-12-07
Further Info :

Pubmed ID

9167318

DOI: Digital Object Identifier

PMC1312921

Related Literature

SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages

English

Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.

This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.