A prospective, double-blind trial of L-hyoscyamine versus glucagon for the inhibition of small intestinal motility during ERCP.

Author: CatalanoM F, GeenenJ E, HoganW J, LahotiS

Paper Details 
Original Abstract of the Article :
BACKGROUND: Glucagon is often used to inhibit duodenal motility and enhance cannulation during ERCP. Levsin is an antimuscarinic, anticholinergic agent that may be as effective as glucagon. METHODS: Three hundred eight patients requiring an antimotility agent during ERCP were randomized in a double...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel IconDr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について

ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。

* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。


引用元:
https://doi.org/10.1016/s0016-5107(97)70061-0

データ提供:米国国立医学図書館(NLM)

Levsin vs. Glucagon: A Tale of Two Antimotility Agents

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), a procedure used to diagnose and treat bile duct and pancreatic disorders, often requires an antimotility agent to inhibit small intestinal motility and enhance cannulation. This study compares the effectiveness of two common antimotility agents, L-hyoscyamine (Levsin) and glucagon, in a double-blind prospective trial. The researchers aimed to determine which agent is more effective and cost-efficient for use during ERCP.

Levsin: A Cost-Effective Alternative to Glucagon

The study found that Levsin, while slightly less effective in inhibiting motility compared to glucagon, was equally effective in facilitating ERCP procedures. It's like discovering a shortcut through the desert, one that saves time and resources without sacrificing effectiveness. The study also found that Levsin was associated with a significant cost advantage, making it a more economical option for healthcare providers.

Navigating ERCP Procedures: Finding the Right Tools for the Job

The study's findings highlight the importance of selecting the most appropriate antimotility agent for ERCP procedures, taking into account both effectiveness and cost. It's like choosing the right camel for a desert journey, considering the terrain, climate, and budget. By carefully evaluating the available options, healthcare providers can ensure the most effective and cost-efficient care for their patients.

Dr. Camel's Conclusion

This research provides valuable insights into the use of antimotility agents during ERCP procedures. The study’s findings demonstrate that Levsin can be a viable and cost-effective alternative to glucagon, offering a more economical option for healthcare providers without compromising the success of the procedure. It's a reminder that even in the vast and complex landscape of healthcare, there are opportunities to find more efficient and affordable solutions while maintaining the highest standards of care.

Date :
  1. Date Completed 1997-10-23
  2. Date Revised 2019-07-22
Further Info :

Pubmed ID

9283863

DOI: Digital Object Identifier

10.1016/s0016-5107(97)70061-0

Related Literature

SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages

English

Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.

This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.