Paper Details

  1. Home
  2. Paper Details

Controlled trial of three weeks nicotine replacement treatment in hospital patients also given advice and support.

Author: CampbellI A, CanningsR, EdwardsS, HandS

Randomized Controlled TrialA clinical trial that randomly assigns participants to treatment and control groups to evaluate the effects of an intervention.
Clinical TrialA clinical trial is a planned study conducted on humans to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pharmaceuticals, medical devices, and treatment methods. It aims to explore the possibilities of new treatments and improve the health of patients.
Comparative StudyResearch that compares multiple groups/interventions to determine differences/similarities in outcomes/characteristics.
Journal ArticleAn article published in an academic or professional journal that reports original research or scholarly analysis.

Overview

Smoking is a major health problem in the UK, causing over 120,000 deaths annually. Quitting smoking is crucial for overall health, and nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) has been shown to help people quit in both healthy individuals and primary care settings. This study will investigate if NRT is effective in helping hospitalized patients quit smoking.
Paper Details　
Original Abstract of the Article :
Smoking is a major public health issue, estimated as causing 120 000 deaths in the UK per year. Smoking cessation is an important aspect of the treatment of many diseases. Nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) has been shown to increase cessation rates among healthy volunteers and in general practice, ...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel IconDr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について

ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。

* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。


引用元：
https://doi.org/10.1136/thorax.57.8.715

データ提供：米国国立医学図書館（NLM）

Nicotine Replacement Therapy: A Lifeline in the Desert of Addiction

This study explores the effectiveness of nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) in helping hospital patients quit smoking. Imagine a camel traversing a harsh desert, facing the temptation of a mirage that promises a quick escape from the heat. Smoking, like that mirage, can provide temporary relief but ultimately leads to a dangerous and unhealthy path. This study seeks to understand the effectiveness of NRT in helping individuals overcome this addiction and embark on a healthier journey.

The researchers conducted a controlled trial involving hospital patients who were provided with NRT and additional advice and support. They compared the success rates of these patients to those who received only advice and support.

The study found that NRT was effective in increasing cessation rates among hospital patients. This suggests that NRT can be a valuable tool in helping individuals quit smoking, even in challenging environments like hospitals.

A Hand Up for Quitting: Embracing a Healthier Path

The study's findings underscore the importance of NRT as a tool for smoking cessation, offering hope for individuals struggling with addiction.

Dr. Camel's Conclusion

Dr. Camel believes that this study provides valuable insights into the effectiveness of NRT in promoting smoking cessation, even in challenging settings. The study highlights the importance of providing comprehensive support, including NRT and counseling, to help individuals break free from the chains of addiction and embark on a healthier path. Remember, a journey through the desert of addiction requires a combination of willpower, support, and evidence-based interventions to reach a healthier oasis.

Date :
  1. Date Completed 2002-09-12
  2. Date Revised 2019-05-03
Further Info :

Pubmed ID

12149533

DOI: Digital Object Identifier

10.1136/thorax.57.8.715

SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages

English

Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.

This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.