Paper Details

  1. Home
  2. Paper Details

Encouraging smokers to quit: the cost effectiveness of reimbursing the costs of smoking cessation treatment.

Author: KaperJanneke, SeverensJohan L, WagenaEdwin J, van SchayckConstant P

Journal ArticleAn article published in an academic or professional journal that reports original research or scholarly analysis.
Randomized Controlled TrialA clinical trial that randomly assigns participants to treatment and control groups to evaluate the effects of an intervention.
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tResearch funding provided by government agencies outside the United States.

Overview

Quitting smoking can increase lifespan and reduce healthcare costs. A study found that reimbursing the cost of smoking cessation treatment (SCT) led to more people using SCT and a greater number of successful quitters compared to not offering reimbursement.
Paper Details　
Original Abstract of the Article :
Smoking cessation should be encouraged in order to increase life expectancy and reduce smoking-related healthcare costs. Results of a randomised trial suggested that reimbursing the costs of smoking cessation treatment (SCT) may lead to an increased use of SCT and an increased number of quitters ver...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel IconDr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について

ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。

* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。


引用元：
https://doi.org/10.2165/00019053-200624050-00004

データ提供：米国国立医学図書館（NLM）

Encouraging Smokers to Quit: The Cost-Effectiveness of Reimbursing Smoking Cessation Treatment

This study delves into the economic implications of encouraging smokers to quit, specifically examining the cost-effectiveness of reimbursing the costs of smoking cessation treatment (SCT). The researchers investigated the potential impact of financial incentives on the use of SCT and the number of successful quitters, analyzing data from a randomized trial.

Navigating the Desert of Smoking Cessation

This research embarks on a journey through the challenging terrain of smoking cessation, exploring the potential impact of financial incentives on quitting behavior. The researchers conducted a randomized trial, seeking to understand the cost-effectiveness of reimbursing SCT and its potential for increasing the number of successful quitters. It's like navigating a desert with a map – understanding the economic factors and behavioral influences can lead to more effective strategies for encouraging smokers to quit.

The Promise of Financial Incentives

The study's findings suggest that reimbursing the costs of SCT can lead to increased use of treatment and a greater number of successful quitters. This suggests that financial incentives could be a valuable tool for promoting smoking cessation and improving public health. It's like finding a hidden oasis in the desert – financial incentives could offer a powerful motivator for smokers seeking to break free from their addiction.

Dr.Camel's Conclusion

This study explores the potential cost-effectiveness of reimbursing smoking cessation treatment, examining the impact of financial incentives on the use of treatment and the number of successful quitters. The findings suggest that financial incentives could be a valuable tool for promoting smoking cessation and improving public health. It's a reminder that understanding the economic and behavioral factors influencing smoking behavior is crucial for developing effective interventions, and that finding innovative solutions can lead to a healthier and more prosperous future for everyone.
Date :
  1. Date Completed 2006-10-17
  2. Date Revised 2018-11-13
Further Info :

Pubmed ID

16706571

DOI: Digital Object Identifier

10.2165/00019053-200624050-00004

SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages

English

Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.

This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.