Paper Details

  1. Home
  2. Paper Details

Antiepileptic drug monotherapy for epilepsy: a network meta-analysis of individual participant data.

Author: MarsonAnthony G, NevittSarah J, SudellMaria, Tudur SmithCatrin, WestonJennifer

Journal ArticleAn article published in an academic or professional journal that reports original research or scholarly analysis.
Meta-AnalysisA statistical technique that integrates the results of multiple studies to draw more general conclusions about a particular issue.
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tResearch funding provided by government agencies outside the United States.
ReviewAn article that critically examines existing research on a particular topic and summarizes the current state of knowledge in the field.
Systematic ReviewA review that systematically collects, evaluates, and integrates relevant research to answer a specific research question.

Overview

Epilepsy affects about 1% of people worldwide. Most people become seizure-free with medication. Current guidelines in the UK recommend carbamazepine or lamotrigine for partial seizures and sodium valproate for generalized seizures, but there are many other epilepsy medications. More research is needed to compare the effectiveness of different medications to help guide treatment choices.
Paper Details　
Original Abstract of the Article :
Epilepsy is a common neurological condition with a worldwide prevalence of around 1%. Approximately 60% to 70% of people with epilepsy will achieve a longer-term remission from seizures, and most achieve that remission shortly after starting antiepileptic drug treatment. Most people with epilepsy ar...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel IconDr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について

ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。

* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。


引用元：
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6481892/

データ提供：米国国立医学図書館（NLM）

Navigating the Labyrinth of Epilepsy Treatments: A Network Meta-Analysis of Individual Participant Data

Epilepsy is a complex neurological condition that affects millions worldwide. It's like a desert storm, unpredictable and potentially devastating. This study takes a comprehensive approach, utilizing a network meta-analysis, to analyze the effectiveness of various antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) for epilepsy treatment. The researchers aimed to create a clear roadmap for clinicians by comparing the efficacy of different AEDs, ultimately helping to inform treatment choices for individuals living with epilepsy. Their findings reveal the importance of carefully selecting the appropriate AED based on the individual's specific needs and seizure type.

Unlocking the Power of Data: Guiding Epilepsy Treatment

This study emphasizes the critical role of data analysis in improving patient care. By pooling individual participant data, the researchers were able to gain a deeper understanding of the comparative effectiveness of different AEDs, leading to more informed treatment decisions for patients with epilepsy.

The Importance of Personalized Treatment: Tailoring Care for Epilepsy

This research underscores the importance of personalized medicine, where treatments are tailored to the specific needs of each individual. By analyzing the effectiveness of different AEDs across various patient subgroups, the study highlights the need for individualized treatment plans for those living with epilepsy.

Dr.Camel's Conclusion

This study serves as a beacon in the desert of epilepsy research, providing valuable insights into the comparative effectiveness of different AEDs. The findings emphasize the need for individualized treatment plans based on patient characteristics and seizure type, highlighting the importance of personalized medicine in improving patient outcomes.

Date :
  1. Date Completed 2017-08-24
  2. Date Revised 2023-11-04
Further Info :

Pubmed ID

28661008

DOI: Digital Object Identifier

PMC6481892

SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages

English

Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.

This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.