Paper Details

  1. Home
  2. Paper Details

Efficacy and side effects of intravenous theophylline in acute asthma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Author: LiJing, MahemutiGulixian, RenLili, TieliwaerdiNueramina, ZhangHui

Systematic ReviewA review that systematically collects, evaluates, and integrates relevant research to answer a specific research question.
Journal ArticleAn article published in an academic or professional journal that reports original research or scholarly analysis.
Meta-AnalysisA statistical technique that integrates the results of multiple studies to draw more general conclusions about a particular issue.
ReviewAn article that critically examines existing research on a particular topic and summarizes the current state of knowledge in the field.

Overview

Theophylline is a long-standing asthma treatment, but its effectiveness and side effects in different patient groups need further investigation. This meta-analysis assesses theophylline's usefulness and side effects in acute asthma.
Paper Details　
Original Abstract of the Article :
Theophylline has been used for decades to treat both acute and chronic asthma. Despite its longevity in the practitioner's formulary, no detailed meta-analysis has been performed to determine the conditions, including concomitant medications, under which theophylline should be used for acute exacerb...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel IconDr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について

ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。

* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。


引用元：
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5768195/

データ提供：米国国立医学図書館（NLM）

Theophylline for Acute Asthma: A Comprehensive Review of Efficacy and Side Effects

Acute asthma exacerbations can be a life-threatening condition, requiring prompt and effective treatment. Theophylline, a bronchodilator, has been used for decades to treat both acute and chronic asthma. However, its role in managing acute asthma exacerbations, especially in the presence of other medications, remains under investigation. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to quantify the efficacy and side effects of intravenous theophylline in acute asthma, with a focus on different patient subgroups and concomitant medications.

Theophylline for Asthma: A Balanced Approach to Treatment

This research, like a team of researchers meticulously examining a complex ecosystem, delves into the world of theophylline treatment for acute asthma. The systematic review and meta-analysis provide a comprehensive overview of the available evidence, highlighting the efficacy and side effects of theophylline in different patient subgroups. The findings underscore the importance of carefully considering the potential benefits and risks of theophylline treatment in the context of individual patient characteristics and concomitant medications.

A Long-Standing Treatment: Navigating the Use of Theophylline

This research, like a camel caravan navigating a familiar desert route, explores the long-standing use of theophylline for acute asthma. The systematic review and meta-analysis provide a valuable update on the current evidence, highlighting the efficacy and side effects of theophylline in different patient subgroups and in the presence of other medications. The findings underscore the need for a balanced approach to theophylline treatment, weighing the potential benefits against the potential risks.

Dr.Camel's Conclusion

The world of asthma treatment is a complex desert landscape, and the use of theophylline presents its own unique challenges. This systematic review and meta-analysis provide valuable insights into the efficacy and side effects of theophylline in treating acute asthma. Like a skilled navigator guiding a caravan through a challenging terrain, healthcare professionals must carefully consider the individual needs of each patient and the potential benefits and risks of theophylline treatment.

Date :
  1. Date Completed 2018-08-29
  2. Date Revised 2023-11-12
Further Info :

Pubmed ID

29391776

DOI: Digital Object Identifier

PMC5768195

SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages

English

Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.

This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.