This information is not medical advice and is not a substitute for diagnosis or treatment by a physician.Data sources and disclaimers (data limitations, copyright, etc.)The analysis on "Effects of theophylline: A Synthesis of Findings from 33 Studies" on this page is based on PubMed data provided by the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM). However, NLM does not endorse or verify these analyses.

This analysis is based on research papers included in PubMed, but medical research is constantly evolving and may not fully reflect the latest findings. There may also be biases towards certain research areas.

This information is not medical advice and is not a substitute for diagnosis or treatment by a physician. If you have concerns about "Effects of theophylline: A Synthesis of Findings from 33 Studies", please consult your doctor.

For NLM copyright information, please see Link to NLM Copyright Page
PubMed data is obtained via Hugging Face Datasets: Link to Dataset
Please check the disclaimer.
This page's analysis is based on PubMed data provided by the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM).
Original Abstract of the Article

Major Research Findings

Theophylline, a widely used asthma medication, has been shown to have potential immunomodulatory effects in addition to its bronchodilator properties. 19 This research found that discontinuing theophylline in patients with asthma led to a significant worsening of asthma symptoms, particularly at night, and a decline in lung function. The study observed a decrease in peripheral blood monocytes, activated CD4+ T-lymphocytes, and activated CD8+ T-cells in individuals with theophylline plasma levels above 5 mg/L. Interestingly, the lymphocyte populations in theophylline-naive patients were similar to those observed after discontinuing theophylline. In contrast, bronchial biopsies revealed an increase in CD4+ and CD8+ lymphocytes in the airways. This suggests that theophylline might control asthma symptoms by preventing the movement of T-cells from the blood into the airways. 30 investigated the impact of low-dose theophylline on airway inflammation in patients with COPD. The study demonstrated that a 4-week course of theophylline significantly reduced levels of neutrophil elastase and myeloperoxidase, markers associated with neutrophil-related inflammation in the airways of patients with mild to moderate COPD. However, the cell differential count did not show significant changes. 28 studied the effects of discontinuing regular oral theophylline in individuals with stable asthma. The findings suggested a slight rebound deterioration in lung function after regular treatment with therapeutic doses of oral theophylline, potentially indicating the development of tolerance. 21 examined the effect of caffeine on histamine-induced bronchoconstriction in individuals with mild asthma. The study found that lower doses of caffeine (≤ 5mg/kg) may inhibit histamine-induced bronchoconstriction. 25 compared the efficacy of salmeterol, an inhaled long-acting bronchodilator, with theophylline, an oral bronchodilator, in the management of asthma. Salmeterol proved significantly more effective than theophylline or placebo in improving asthma symptoms, reducing nighttime awakenings, and decreasing the need for rescue medication. Moreover, patients on salmeterol reported greater satisfaction with their asthma treatment compared to those on theophylline. 16 compared the effects of low doses of theophylline and terbutaline on acute pulmonary and cardiovascular function in individuals with asthma. The study found that terbutaline alone produced significant bronchodilation, while theophylline alone had minimal impact on bronchodilation and did not enhance the bronchodilator effects of terbutaline when combined. 26 assessed the relative psychological side effects of theophylline and beclomethasone in asthmatic children. 5 investigated the influence of manufacturer's information inserts on perceived theophylline side effects. The study concluded that the insert might have increased patients' awareness of potential side effects, potentially impacting compliance with treatment. 27 compared the effects of different theophylline formulations on daytime variation of bronchial hyperresponsiveness in asthmatic patients. This study suggested that once-daily theophylline administered in the evening might provide better stabilization of airway function than twice-daily theophylline. 31 conducted a meta-analysis examining the efficacy of oral theophylline in patients with stable COPD. The analysis concluded that oral theophylline was effective in improving lung function in individuals with stable COPD. 10 compared the effects of theophylline and enprofylline on the cardio-respiratory stimulation induced by infused adenosine. Theophylline inhibited, while enprofylline augmented, some cardio-respiratory stimulant effects of adenosine. 9 reported that children switched from theophylline to cromolyn sodium therapy showed improvements in memory, concentration, and behavior. 13 compared two sustained-release aminophylline preparations and found no significant differences in plasma levels. 14 studied the effects of oral theophylline alone and in combination with oral salbutamol in children with asthma. The combination therapy led to higher pulse rates, lower peak flow measurements, and reduced blood theophylline levels, suggesting a negative interaction between the drugs. 7 demonstrated significant food effects on the pharmacokinetics of theophylline when administered in the evening, leading to higher peak serum levels and delayed drug absorption. 32 conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis examining the efficacy and side effects of intravenous theophylline in acute asthma. 12 studied the impact of food on serum theophylline levels in individuals with airway obstruction. 6 investigated the influence of nifedipine and diltiazem on theophylline pharmacokinetics. 22 examined the behavioral and cognitive effects of theophylline in asthmatic children. 4 assessed the effects of therapeutic theophylline concentrations on behavior, cognitive processing, and mood in children with asthma. 18 investigated the effects of theophylline on mucosal inflammation in asthmatic airways. 29 compared the effectiveness of high-dose inhaled steroids, low-dose inhaled steroids plus low-dose theophylline, and low-dose inhaled steroids alone in chronic asthma. 11 examined the extrapulmonary effects of maintenance theophylline therapy in patients with asthma. 15 investigated the bioavailability of different theophylline tablets in asthmatic patients. 20 examined the relationships between the pharmacokinetics and nonpulmonary pharmacodynamic effects of theophylline.

Benefits and Risks

Benefit Summary

Theophylline has shown potential benefits in managing asthma and COPD, demonstrating bronchodilator and anti-inflammatory effects. 19 , 30 , 31 Theophylline may help control asthma symptoms, particularly nighttime symptoms. 19 Theophylline might reduce airway inflammation in patients with COPD. 30 When combined with inhaled beta-agonists, theophylline could potentially enhance bronchodilation. 15

Risk Summary

Theophylline can cause various side effects, including gastrointestinal issues, increased heart rate, reduced blood theophylline levels, neurological effects, behavioral problems, depression, and anxiety. 25 , 14 , 9 It is important to exercise caution when using theophylline in patients with specific health conditions, such as angina, arrhythmias, hyperthyroidism, hypertension, liver disease, or kidney disease. 32 The risk of side effects can increase when combining theophylline with other methylxanthines, such as caffeine. 24 Theophylline should be avoided during pregnancy and breastfeeding. 32 The dosage of theophylline needs to be individualized and adjusted based on the patient's specific needs; therefore, adhering to your doctor's instructions is crucial. 12 Regular monitoring of theophylline blood levels is necessary. 12 Theophylline absorption can be affected by food, so pay attention to meal timing. 7 Theophylline can interact with other medications, so inform your doctor about any other medications you are taking. 6

Comparison of Studies

Commonalities

Several studies have shown that theophylline may exhibit bronchodilator and anti-inflammatory effects, suggesting its potential benefits in managing asthma and COPD. 19 , 30 , 31 Similarly, multiple studies indicate that theophylline can cause side effects, including gastrointestinal issues, increased heart rate, and neurological effects. 25 , 14 Across the studies, there is a consensus that theophylline's dosage should be tailored to the individual patient due to variability in response. 12

Differences

There are discrepancies in the findings regarding the effectiveness and side effects of theophylline across different studies. For instance, 19 suggests that discontinuing theophylline worsens asthma symptoms, whereas 28 indicates a potential for slight lung function improvement after stopping theophylline. 25 concluded that salmeterol is more effective and safer than theophylline, but other studies suggest that theophylline may be more effective when combined with other treatments. 15

Consistency and Contradictions of Findings

While there is some consistency in the research indicating theophylline's potential for bronchodilation and its association with side effects, there are also contradictions in the findings. 19 , 30 , 31 , 25 , 14 , 12 The variability in findings across different studies highlights the need for further research to clarify the precise effects and safety profile of theophylline. 19 , 28 , 25 , 15

Practical Implications

Theophylline can be a helpful treatment for respiratory conditions like asthma and COPD. 19 , 30 , 31 However, it is crucial to be aware of the potential side effects and follow your doctor's instructions for taking theophylline. 12 Remember that food can affect theophylline's absorption, so be mindful of meal timing. 7 Also, be sure to inform your doctor about any other medications you are taking, as theophylline can interact with other drugs. 6

Limitations of Current Research

While numerous studies have been conducted on theophylline, there are limitations to the current research. Some studies involved small sample sizes, potentially limiting the generalizability of the findings. Additionally, differences in study designs and methodologies can make comparing results challenging. Furthermore, research on the long-term effects of theophylline is still lacking.

Future Research Directions

Further research is necessary to gain a more comprehensive understanding of the effectiveness and safety of theophylline. Specifically, more research is needed on the long-term impacts of theophylline, its effects when combined with other treatments, and its impact on diverse patient populations.

Conclusion

Theophylline holds promise for managing asthma and COPD, exhibiting bronchodilator and anti-inflammatory properties. However, the potential for side effects underscores the importance of following your doctor's instructions and maintaining regular monitoring. Future research is essential to refine our understanding of theophylline's precise benefits and risks.


Keywords
Literature analysis of 33 papers
Positive Content
24
Neutral Content
1
Negative Content
8
Article Type
29
3
2
1
33

Language : German


Language : English


Language : English


Language : English


Language : English


Language : English


Language : English


Language : English


Language : English


Language : English


Language : English


Language : English


Language : German


Language : English


Language : English


Language : English


Language : English


Language : English


Language : English


Language : English


Language : English


Language : English


Language : German


Language : English


Language : English


Language : English


Language : English


Language : English


Language : English


Language : English


Language : English


Language : English


Language : English


This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.