Paper Details

  1. Home
  2. Paper Details

The effectiveness of manual therapy and proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation compared to kinesiotherapy: a four-arm randomized controlled trial.

Author: LatosiewiczRobert, ZaworskiKamil

Comparative StudyResearch that compares multiple groups/interventions to determine differences/similarities in outcomes/characteristics.
Journal ArticleAn article published in an academic or professional journal that reports original research or scholarly analysis.
Randomized Controlled TrialA clinical trial that randomly assigns participants to treatment and control groups to evaluate the effects of an intervention.

Overview

Combined therapy of manual therapy and proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF) was more effective than traditional kinesiotherapy in improving functional ability in patients with non-specific low back pain (LBP). All treatment methods showed significant pain reduction and decreased disability.
Paper Details　
Original Abstract of the Article :
BACKGROUND: Low back pain (LBP) has a negative impact on patients' life, not only from the physical point of view, but also in terms of psychic, social and economic wellbeing. The increasing costs of treatment and health care encourage the search for the most effective methods of treatment. AIM: Th...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel IconDr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について

ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。

* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。


引用元：
https://doi.org/10.23736/S1973-9087.21.06344-9

データ提供：米国国立医学図書館（NLM）

Comparing Treatment Approaches for Low Back Pain

This study investigates the effectiveness of different therapeutic approaches for treating low back pain (LBP), a prevalent condition that can significantly impact an individual's quality of life. The researchers conducted a four-arm randomized controlled trial comparing the effectiveness of manual therapy, proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF), and combined manual therapy and PNF techniques to traditional kinesiotherapy. The results indicated that combined manual therapy and PNF yielded the greatest improvement in pain reduction and functional ability compared to the other treatment approaches.

Addressing Low Back Pain: Finding the Right Approach

The study's findings suggest that a combined approach incorporating manual therapy and PNF techniques may be more effective than traditional kinesiotherapy in treating LBP. This information could inform clinical practice and guide the selection of appropriate treatment strategies for patients experiencing this common condition.

Navigating the Labyrinth of Back Pain: A Multifaceted Approach

As a physical therapist, I am constantly searching for the most effective ways to address LBP in my patients. This research underscores the importance of considering different treatment approaches and tailoring them to individual patient needs. It reminds me of navigating a complex labyrinth, where each turn represents a different therapeutic strategy, and the ultimate goal is to find the most effective path to pain relief.

Dr.Camel's Conclusion

This randomized controlled trial highlights the potential benefits of combining manual therapy and proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation techniques in the treatment of low back pain. The study's findings suggest that this approach may lead to greater pain reduction and improved functional ability compared to traditional kinesiotherapy, offering valuable insights for optimizing treatment strategies for patients experiencing this common condition.
Date :
  1. Date Completed 2021-06-08
  2. Date Revised 2021-06-08
Further Info :

Pubmed ID

33650840

DOI: Digital Object Identifier

10.23736/S1973-9087.21.06344-9

SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages

English

Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.

This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.