E-cigarettes versus nicotine replacement treatment as harm reduction interventions for smokers who find quitting difficult: randomized controlled trial.

Author: HajekPeter, McRobbieHayden, Myers SmithKatie, OrzolMarzena, PesolaFrancesca, Phillips-WallerAnna, PrzuljDunja

Paper Details 
Original Abstract of the Article :
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The majority of smokers accessing the current best treatments continue to smoke. We aimed to test if e-cigarettes (EC) compared with nicotine replacement treatment (NRT) can help such smokers to reduce smoking. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial of EC (n = 68) versus NRT (n = ...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel IconDr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について

ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。

* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。


引用元:
https://doi.org/10.1111/add.15628

データ提供:米国国立医学図書館(NLM)

E-Cigarettes vs. Nicotine Replacement Therapy: A Battle for Quitting

Quitting smoking can be a tough battle, and finding the right tools to help is crucial. This study compares the effectiveness of e-cigarettes (EC) and nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) in helping smokers who struggle to quit. The researchers randomly assigned smokers to receive either EC or NRT and tracked their progress over six months. They found that EC was significantly more effective than NRT in reducing smoking and achieving long-term abstinence.

E-Cigarettes Emerge as a Potential Quitting Aid

The study revealed that EC significantly outperformed NRT in helping smokers reduce their smoking and achieve long-term abstinence. This finding suggests that EC could be a valuable tool for smokers who have struggled to quit using conventional methods. It is important to note that while EC may be a helpful aid, they are not risk-free and should be used with caution and under the guidance of a healthcare professional.

Navigating the Path to Smoke-Free Living

This study provides valuable insights into the potential of EC as a smoking cessation tool. It's a reminder that the landscape of smoking cessation is constantly evolving and new approaches are emerging to help smokers quit. Just as a camel navigates the desert, we need to explore the different paths to reach our goals, and EC could be one of them.

Dr. Camel's Conclusion

This research is a reminder that the journey to quitting smoking can be challenging, and there's no one-size-fits-all solution. This study suggests that EC could be a helpful tool for some smokers, but it's important to approach these devices with caution and consult with a healthcare professional. The desert of smoking cessation is vast and requires a personalized approach to find the right path.

Date :
  1. Date Completed 2022-02-01
  2. Date Revised 2022-02-01
Further Info :

Pubmed ID

34187081

DOI: Digital Object Identifier

10.1111/add.15628

SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages

English

Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.

This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.