Paper Details

  1. Home
  2. Paper Details

Coronary angioplasty versus medical therapy for angina: the second Randomised Intervention Treatment of Angina (RITA-2) trial. RITA-2 trial participants.

Author:

Journal ArticleAn article published in an academic or professional journal that reports original research or scholarly analysis.
Clinical TrialA clinical trial is a planned study conducted on humans to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pharmaceuticals, medical devices, and treatment methods. It aims to explore the possibilities of new treatments and improve the health of patients.
Comparative StudyResearch that compares multiple groups/interventions to determine differences/similarities in outcomes/characteristics.
Multicenter StudyResearch conducted in collaboration with multiple research institutions. It aims to collect a wide range of data and obtain more generalizable results.
Randomized Controlled TrialA clinical trial that randomly assigns participants to treatment and control groups to evaluate the effects of an intervention.
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tResearch funding provided by government agencies outside the United States.

Overview

Early intervention with PTCA was associated with greater symptomatic improvement, especially in patients with more severe angina. PTCA was associated with a small excess hazard due to procedure-related complications.
Paper Details　
Original Abstract of the Article :
BACKGROUND: The role of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) in the management of patients with angina remains controversial, particularly in patients whose symptoms are adequately controlled by medical treatment. METHODS: RITA-2 is a randomised trial comparing the long-term effect...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel IconDr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について

ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。

* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。


引用元：
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9274581

データ提供：米国国立医学図書館（NLM）

Coronary Angioplasty vs. Medical Therapy for Angina: The RITA-2 Trial

Dr. Camel here, ready to delve into the heart of this research. Angina, or chest pain, can be as uncomfortable as walking across a scorching desert. This study, RITA-2, compared two approaches to managing angina: percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) and conservative (medical) care. It's like choosing between a camel caravan for a direct route or a longer, more scenic journey.

PTCA: A Potential Shortcut, But With Risks

The study showed that PTCA was associated with greater improvement in angina symptoms, especially for those with severe pain. Think of it like a shorter, less painful desert route. However, PTCA also had a slightly higher risk of death or non-fatal heart attack due to procedure-related complications, like a potential risk of getting lost in the desert. Ultimately, the researchers concluded that the benefits of PTCA have to be carefully weighed against these risks.

Navigating Angina: A Balance Between Comfort and Safety

Angina can be a debilitating condition, but understanding your treatment options is crucial. PTCA can provide quicker relief, but it also has potential complications. Medical therapy might take a bit longer to show improvement, but it generally involves fewer risks. The choice ultimately depends on your individual needs and preferences. Just like navigating a desert, you want to find the best path for your journey.

Dr. Camel's Conclusion

The RITA-2 trial highlights the need for a balanced approach to managing angina. It emphasizes the importance of considering both the potential benefits and risks of different treatments. Choosing the right path, just like finding the right oasis in the desert, is essential for a successful and comfortable journey.

Date :
  1. Date Completed 1997-09-12
  2. Date Revised 2022-03-09
Further Info :

Pubmed ID

9274581

DOI: Digital Object Identifier

S014067369707298X

SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages

English

Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.

This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.