Paper Details
- Home
- Paper Details
Comparison of Peripheral Neurectomy vs. Medical Treatment for Migraine: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Author: BajajJitin, ChandraSarat P, DoddamaniRamesh, PariharVijay, RatreShailendra, SharmaDhananjaya, YadavYadram
Original Abstract of the Article :
BACKGROUND: Migraine is a common form of primary neurologic headache. Many patients are chronic migraineurs and suffer from a significant disability and adverse effects of drugs. There are various surgical options available to treat migraines, including peripheral neurectomies. OBJECTIVE: To study ...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について
ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。
* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。
引用元:
https://doi.org/10.4103/0028-3886.315973
データ提供:米国国立医学図書館(NLM)
Migraine Treatment: Comparing Peripheral Neurectomy to Medical Management
This study compares the surgical and functional outcomes of peripheral neurectomy, a surgical procedure that involves the lysis of peripheral nerves, to conservative medical treatment for migraine headaches. The study enrolled patients with unilateral migraine headaches who experienced pain relief after a local bupivacaine block at the suspected trigger site. Patients who experienced relief from the block were offered the option of surgery. In the operative group, the peripheral nerve at the trigger site was lysed under local anesthesia. The conservative group continued with standard medical treatment. The researchers assessed the effectiveness of both treatment approaches by evaluating visual analog score (VAS), migraine headache index (MHI), migraine disability assessment test (MIDAS), and pain self-efficacy questionnaire (PSEQ) scores at baseline and 6 months after treatment.
Peripheral Neurectomy: A Potential Option for Chronic Migraine
The study found that peripheral neurectomy was significantly more effective than conservative medical treatment in improving migraine symptoms and reducing disability. The operative group experienced significant improvements in all outcome measures 6 months after surgery. The study also noted that patients in the operative group were able to discontinue prophylactic migraine medications, although some still required occasional use of analgesics.
Navigating Migraine Treatment Options: A Personalized Approach
This study underscores the need for a personalized approach to migraine treatment, considering both the individual patient's needs and the availability of different treatment options. The study suggests that peripheral neurectomy may be an effective option for carefully selected patients with chronic migraine, but further research is needed to establish its long-term benefits and potential complications.
Dr.Camel's Conclusion
This research provides valuable information for healthcare professionals and patients seeking effective treatment for chronic migraine. The study highlights the potential benefits of peripheral neurectomy for select patients but emphasizes the need for careful patient selection and a thorough understanding of the procedure's risks and benefits. As a researcher, I believe that further investigation into the long-term outcomes and potential complications of peripheral neurectomy is essential to ensure its safe and effective application in migraine management.
Date :
- Date Completed 2021-06-21
- Date Revised 2022-04-23
Further Info :
Related Literature
English
This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.