Paper Details

  1. Home
  2. Paper Details

Comparison of the acute cardiopulmonary effects of oral albuterol, metaproterenol, and terbutaline in asthmatics.

Author: BiedermannA A, ChuT J, WolfeJ D, YamateM

Controlled Clinical TrialA clinical trial that evaluates the effectiveness of a treatment by comparing a group that receives the intervention with a group that receives a placebo or standard treatment.
Clinical TrialA clinical trial is a planned study conducted on humans to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pharmaceuticals, medical devices, and treatment methods. It aims to explore the possibilities of new treatments and improve the health of patients.
Comparative StudyResearch that compares multiple groups/interventions to determine differences/similarities in outcomes/characteristics.
Journal ArticleAn article published in an academic or professional journal that reports original research or scholarly analysis.

Overview

Oral albuterol and terbutaline were found to be more effective and longer-acting bronchodilators than oral metaproterenol. Albuterol was associated with fewer side effects. The more rapid onset of action of metaproterenol suggests that it may be advantageous for as-needed use.
Paper Details　
Original Abstract of the Article :
The acute cardiopulmonary effects of oral albuterol, 4 mg, metaproterenol sulfate, 20 mg, and terbutaline sulfate, 5 mg, were compared over eight hours in 20 moderate to severe asthmatics. The magnitude and time course of bronchodilation following albuterol and terbutaline were comparable. Albuterol...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel IconDr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について

ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。

* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。


引用元：
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3974097

データ提供：米国国立医学図書館（NLM）

Comparing Bronchodilators: A Race Through the Desert of Asthma

Asthma, a chronic respiratory condition, can make breathing feel like a struggle through a desert sandstorm. This research compares the effects of three different bronchodilators: albuterol, metaproterenol, and terbutaline.

The researchers examined the effects of these medications on 20 asthmatics, like observing a group of camels racing across a desert landscape. They found that albuterol and terbutaline produced comparable bronchodilation, lasting for at least eight hours. However, metaproterenol had a shorter duration of action, like a camel that tires quickly.

They also observed that albuterol had fewer side effects, like a camel that can endure the journey with fewer bumps and bruises. These findings suggest that albuterol and terbutaline might be more suitable for long-acting relief, while metaproterenol could be more effective for immediate needs.

Finding the Right Route Through the Desert of Asthma

This research highlights the importance of choosing the right bronchodilator for your specific needs. It's like selecting the best camel for your desert journey, ensuring a comfortable and effective travel experience.

Managing Your Asthma: Understanding Your Options

Working closely with your doctor to determine the best bronchodilator for you is crucial. It's like a caravan leader carefully selecting the right camels for its expedition, ensuring a safe and successful journey through the desert of asthma.

Dr.Camel's Conclusion

This research provides valuable insight into the effectiveness of different bronchodilators for asthma management. It's like a caravan exploring different desert routes, seeking the most efficient and comfortable path to navigate the challenges of this condition.

Date :
  1. Date Completed 1985-04-24
  2. Date Revised 2016-10-17
Further Info :

Pubmed ID

3974097

DOI: Digital Object Identifier

3974097

SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages

English

Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.

This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.