Paper Details

  1. Home
  2. Paper Details

[Double-blind comparison of cefadroxil and cephalexin granules in the treatment of impetigo].

Author: ArataJ, HiramatsuH, MiyoshiK, NakagawaS, NishiharaO, NoharaN, SuwakiM, UmemuraS, YamadaM, YamamotoY

English AbstractA summary of a research paper/publication written in English for a wider audience.
Clinical TrialA clinical trial is a planned study conducted on humans to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pharmaceuticals, medical devices, and treatment methods. It aims to explore the possibilities of new treatments and improve the health of patients.
Comparative StudyResearch that compares multiple groups/interventions to determine differences/similarities in outcomes/characteristics.
Controlled Clinical TrialA clinical trial that evaluates the effectiveness of a treatment by comparing a group that receives the intervention with a group that receives a placebo or standard treatment.
Journal ArticleAn article published in an academic or professional journal that reports original research or scholarly analysis.

Overview

Cefadroxil was slightly better than cephalexin in treating impetigo in children, but the difference was not statistically significant.
Paper Details　
Original Abstract of the Article :
A double-blind clinical comparison of cefadroxil granules (CDX) and a long-acting preparation of cephalexin granules (L-CEX) was conducted in the treatment of impetigo in children. The long-acting cephalexin preparation was composed of 3 parts of granules soluble in the stomach and 7 parts of those ...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel IconDr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について

ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。

* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。


引用元：
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6361311

データ提供：米国国立医学図書館（NLM）

Comparing the Effectiveness of Cefadroxil and Cephalexin Granules for Impetigo

The world of medicine is a vast desert, filled with countless remedies for various ailments. In this research expedition, we're exploring the effectiveness of two antibiotics, cefadroxil and cephalexin granules, in treating impetigo in children. The study used a double-blind clinical comparison to assess the efficacy of these medications in children of different weight groups. The researchers discovered that cefadroxil granules performed slightly better than cephalexin granules, though the differences were not statistically significant. This finding suggests that cefadroxil might be a slightly more effective treatment option, but further research is needed to confirm this observation.

Cefadroxil: A Potential Winner in the Battle Against Impetigo

The study revealed that cefadroxil granules showed a slight advantage in treating impetigo, particularly in children weighing between 10 and 20 kg. However, the difference was not statistically significant, leaving some room for interpretation. This suggests that cefadroxil might be a slightly more effective treatment option, but more evidence is needed to support this claim.

Impetigo: A Common Skin Infection

Impetigo is a common skin infection, particularly among children. It's characterized by blisters that burst and form crusts. While both cefadroxil and cephalexin are effective antibiotics for impetigo, this research suggests that cefadroxil may be slightly more effective, especially in certain weight groups. Parents should consult a doctor if their child develops impetigo to receive the most appropriate treatment.

Dr. Camel's Conclusion

The study's findings suggest that cefadroxil may be a slightly more effective treatment option for impetigo in children, especially those weighing between 10 and 20 kg. However, further research is needed to solidify these findings and confirm cefadroxil's superiority. As a wise camel traversing the vast desert of medical knowledge, I urge you to always consult a doctor for proper diagnosis and treatment of any health concerns.

Date :
  1. Date Completed 1984-02-14
  2. Date Revised 2016-11-16
Further Info :

Pubmed ID

6361311

DOI: Digital Object Identifier

6361311

SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages

Japanese

Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.

This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.