A prospective randomized comparison of total body irradiation-etoposide versus busulfan-cyclophosphamide as preparatory regimens for bone marrow transplantation in patients with leukemia who were not in first remission: a Southwest Oncology Group study.

Author: AppelbaumF R, BlumeK G, FormanS J, Henslee-DowneyJ P, KopeckyK J, LeMaistreC F, StiffP J

Paper Details 
Original Abstract of the Article :
Two novel preparatory regimens for conditioning of patients with leukemia for allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT) from histocompatible sibling donors have been tested in a phase III trial under the auspices of the Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG 8612). These two regimens consisted either of ...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel IconDr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について

ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。

* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。


引用元:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8471778

データ提供:米国国立医学図書館(NLM)

Preparing for Bone Marrow Transplantation: A Comparison of Conditioning Regimens

Bone marrow transplantation is a life-saving treatment for many patients with leukemia, but the process of preparing the patient for transplantation is often fraught with challenges. This study, conducted by the Southwest Oncology Group, compares two different conditioning regimens for patients with leukemia who were not in their first remission. The researchers sought to determine the best approach to prepare these patients for allogeneic bone marrow transplantation from histocompatible sibling donors.

Two Pathways: FTBI/VP-16 vs. BU/CY

The study compared two regimens: fractionated total body irradiation and etoposide (FTBI/VP-16) and high-dose busulfan with cyclophosphamide (BU/CY). The researchers found no significant difference in overall survival or disease-free survival between the two regimens. While the FTBI/VP-16 regimen showed a trend towards better survival in patients with good-risk leukemia, the difference was not statistically significant. Both regimens were well tolerated, with no regimen-related deaths during the six-week period after transplantation.

Navigating the Desert: Considerations for Conditioning Regimens

This study provides valuable insights into the effectiveness and safety of two different conditioning regimens for patients with leukemia. While neither regimen emerged as definitively superior, the study highlights the importance of considering factors such as the patient's risk category and individual characteristics when choosing a conditioning regimen. Finding the right path through the desert of leukemia treatment requires a careful assessment of each patient's unique needs.

Dr. Camel's Conclusion

This study presents a valuable comparison of two conditioning regimens for patients with leukemia undergoing bone marrow transplantation. While the study found no clear superiority of one regimen over the other, it highlights the importance of individualized care and careful consideration of patient-specific factors in selecting the optimal conditioning approach. Navigating the desert of leukemia treatment requires a deep understanding of different treatment options and a commitment to providing personalized care.
Date :
  1. Date Completed 1993-05-19
  2. Date Revised 2021-02-16
Further Info :

Pubmed ID

8471778

DOI: Digital Object Identifier

S0006-4971(20)80509-6

SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages

English

Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.

This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.