Effects of deflazacort: A Synthesis of Findings from 20 Studies
- Home
- Effects of deflazacort
This analysis is based on research papers included in PubMed, but medical research is constantly evolving and may not fully reflect the latest findings. There may also be biases towards certain research areas.
This information is not medical advice and is not a substitute for diagnosis or treatment by a physician. If you have concerns about "Effects of deflazacort: A Synthesis of Findings from 20 Studies", please consult your doctor.
For NLM copyright information, please see Link to NLM Copyright Page
PubMed data is obtained via Hugging Face Datasets: Link to DatasetPlease check the disclaimer.
Major research findings
Deflazacort is a synthetic glucocorticoid that has been shown to have fewer adverse effects on bone metabolism, weight gain, and Cushing’s syndrome compared to prednisolone. 4 , 2 , 19 , 10 Deflazacort has been shown to be less effective in suppressing bone formation than prednisolone, suggesting it may have bone-sparing properties. 8 , 13 Deflazacort has been suggested to have a stronger immunosuppressive effect than prednisolone. 3 Deflazacort has also been shown to have less of an impact on blood lipid levels compared to prednisolone. 10 , 5 Studies have indicated that deflazacort may have a less negative effect on growth velocity than prednisolone. 5 , 15 , 11 In some studies, deflazacort has been observed to have a smaller impact on blood glucose levels than prednisolone. 16 Some research suggests that deflazacort may have a less significant effect on liver IGF-I and growth hormone receptor mRNA levels compared to prednisolone. 14
Benefits and Risks
Benefit Summary
Deflazacort has been shown to have a favorable profile compared to prednisolone in terms of bone metabolism, weight gain, and Cushing’s syndrome. It may also have less of an impact on blood lipid levels and growth velocity. Deflazacort could potentially have less of an effect on blood glucose levels. 4 , 2 , 19 , 10 , 8 , 13 , 3 , 10 , 5 , 15 , 11 , 16 , 14
Risk Summary
Deflazacort may have a stronger immunosuppressive effect than prednisolone, leading to a potential increase in the risk of opportunistic infections. 3
Comparison of Studies
Commonalities
Several studies have demonstrated that deflazacort shows fewer adverse effects on bone metabolism, weight gain, and Cushing’s syndrome compared to prednisolone. 4 , 2 , 19 , 10 Additionally, a majority of the research indicates that deflazacort has a smaller impact on blood lipid levels. 10 , 5
Differences
Findings regarding the strength of deflazacort’s immunosuppressive effect and its impact on growth velocity vary across different studies. 3 5 , 15 , 11 These discrepancies may stem from variations in research design and participant characteristics.
Consistency and Contradictions of Findings
A significant portion of the research suggests that deflazacort has a more favorable profile than prednisolone in terms of bone metabolism, weight gain, and Cushing’s syndrome. 4 , 2 , 19 , 10 However, findings concerning the strength of deflazacort’s immunosuppressive effect and its impact on growth velocity vary across studies. 3 5 , 15 , 11 These inconsistencies could be attributed to differences in research design and participant characteristics.
Points to Consider for Real-World Application
Deflazacort may offer advantages over prednisolone in terms of bone metabolism, weight gain, and Cushing’s syndrome. 4 , 2 , 19 , 10 However, the potential for a stronger immunosuppressive effect with deflazacort, leading to an elevated risk of opportunistic infections, should be carefully considered. 3 When using deflazacort, a thorough evaluation of the risks and benefits is crucial.
Current Limitations of Research
The current body of research on deflazacort is still limited. Research on long-term safety and efficacy is particularly lacking. 3 Additionally, results concerning deflazacort’s immunosuppressive effect and its impact on growth velocity vary between studies. 3 5 , 15 , 11 These inconsistencies could be attributed to differences in research design and participant characteristics.
Future Research Directions
To gain a better understanding of deflazacort’s long-term safety and efficacy, larger clinical trials are needed. Furthermore, studies should be designed to provide a more precise comparison of the immunosuppressive effects of deflazacort and prednisolone, and their respective impacts on growth velocity. 3 5 , 15 , 11 To achieve this, research designs and participant characteristics should be standardized across studies.
Conclusion
Deflazacort may offer advantages over prednisolone in terms of bone metabolism, weight gain, and Cushing’s syndrome. 4 , 2 , 19 , 10 However, it is important to note the potential for a stronger immunosuppressive effect with deflazacort, which may increase the risk of opportunistic infections. 3 When considering deflazacort, a careful evaluation of the risks and benefits is essential. More research is needed to thoroughly assess the long-term safety and efficacy of deflazacort. Future research should focus on addressing the inconsistencies observed in current studies regarding the immunosuppressive effect and growth velocity impact of deflazacort. 3 5 , 15 , 11 By standardizing research designs and participant characteristics, we can gain a more definitive understanding of the impact of deflazacort.
Benefit Keywords
Risk Keywords
Article Type
Author: BabadjanovaG, AllolioB, VollmerM, ReinckeM, SchulteH M
Language : English
Author: GanapatiA, RavindranR, DavidT, YadavB, JeyaseelanV, JeyaseelanL, DandaD
Language : English
Author: Gonzalez-PerezOscar, LuquinSonia, Garcia-EstradaJoaquin, Ramos-RemusCesar
Language : English
Author: SaviolaG, Abdi AliL, Shams EddinS, CoppiniA, CavalieriF, CampostriniL, SaccoS, BucciM, CirinoG, RossiniM
Language : English
Author: FerrarisJorge R, PasqualiniTitania, AlonsoGuillermo, LegalSusana, SorrochePatricia, GalichAna M, JasperHéctor,
Language : English
Author: GuerreroRosa, de la PiedraConcepción, TeixeiroEmma, BragadoRafael, TrabaMaria Luisa
Language : English
Author: LattaKay, KriegRichard J, Carbajo-PérezEduardo, CarbajoSantiago, ChanJames C M
Language : English
Author: CacoubP, ChemlalK, KhalifaP, WechslerB, De GennesC, BelmatougN, CohenP, ZizaJ M, VerdoncqB, PietteJ C
Language : English
Author: Zwadlo-KlarwasserG, SchmutzlerW
Language : English
Author: LippunerK, CasezJ P, HorberF F, JaegerP
Language : English
Author: FerrarisJ R, PennisiP, PasqualiniT, JasperH
Language : English
Author: BabadjanovaG, AllolioB, VollmerM, ReinckeM, SchulteH M
Language : English
Author: Lo CascioV, KanisJ A, BenetonM N, BertoldoF, AdamiS, PoggiG, ZanolinM E
Language : English
Author: LattaK, KriegR J, ChanW, HisanoS, ChanJ C
Language : English
Author: AicardiG, BensoL, VignoloM, TerragnaA, VerrinaE, CordoneG, CoppoR, SerniaO, SardellaM L, Di BattistaE
Language : English
Author: ArizónJ M, AnguitaM, VallésF, MonteroA, SanchoM, López-RubioF, LatreJ M, CallejaF, CasaresJ, RománM
Language : English
Author: CiprandiG, BuscagliaS, IudiceA, PesceG P, BagnascoM, CanonicaG W
Language : English
Author: CanalisE, AvioliL
Language : English
Author: OlgaardK, StormT, van WowernN, DaugaardH, EgfjordM, LewinE, BrandiL
Language : English
Author: BalsanS, StéruD, BourdeauA, GrimbergR, LenoirG
Language : English
This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.