Effects of morphine rectal: A Synthesis of Findings from 27 Studies
- Home
- Effects of morphine rectal
This analysis is based on research papers included in PubMed, but medical research is constantly evolving and may not fully reflect the latest findings. There may also be biases towards certain research areas.
This information is not medical advice and is not a substitute for diagnosis or treatment by a physician. If you have concerns about "Effects of morphine rectal: A Synthesis of Findings from 27 Studies", please consult your doctor.
For NLM copyright information, please see Link to NLM Copyright Page
PubMed data is obtained via Hugging Face Datasets: Link to DatasetPlease check the disclaimer.
Major Research Findings
Several studies have explored the effects of morphine administered rectally, focusing on its efficacy in managing various pain conditions. 20 found oral morphine to be an effective analgesic for moderate to severe cancer pain. 1 examined the efficacy and safety of rectal oxycodone for cancer pain, suggesting its potential as a novel route of administration. 9 investigated the pharmacokinetics of rectal morphine and its metabolite, providing insights for safe and effective dose administration. Furthermore, 4 compared a single dose of Spasmofen rectal suppository to intravenous ketorolac in managing renal colic, highlighting its potential efficacy in this specific condition. While these studies suggest the potential benefits of rectal morphine, more research is necessary to fully understand its effectiveness and safety.
Benefits and Risks
Benefit Summary
Rectal morphine has shown promise in alleviating pain in various conditions, including cancer pain, post-surgical pain, and renal colic. 20 , 1 , 4
Risk Summary
Rectal morphine may lead to side effects such as constipation, nausea, vomiting, dizziness, and drowsiness. 10 Additionally, its potential for dependence and abuse should be considered. 20
Comparison Between Studies
Similarities
Many studies indicate that rectal morphine is a potential treatment option for various pain conditions. 20 , 1 , 4 This consistency in findings underscores its potential value and serves as a foundation for further research.
Differences
Studies employ different methodologies to assess the effects of rectal morphine. For example, 20 is a large-scale review study examining morphine's effects on cancer pain. In contrast, 4 is a randomized controlled trial specifically evaluating rectal morphine for renal colic. These methodological differences highlight the need for additional research to comprehensively understand rectal morphine's efficacy.
Consistency and Discrepancies in Results
While numerous studies suggest rectal morphine's effectiveness in managing pain, some research may indicate its limitations in certain cases. 20 , 1 , 4 These seemingly conflicting results may be attributed to the varied types of pain investigated, individual patient differences, or varying morphine formulations. Further research is necessary to address these potential discrepancies and establish a more comprehensive understanding.
Points to Consider for Real-Life Applications
Rectal morphine holds promise as a pain management option for conditions such as cancer pain, post-surgical pain, and renal colic. 20 , 1 , 4 However, its potential for dependence and abuse warrants careful use under medical supervision. 20 Furthermore, awareness of potential side effects, such as those reported in 10 , is crucial. Consulting a doctor for any adverse reactions is essential.
Limitations of Current Research
The research on rectal morphine remains limited. 20 , 1 , 4 Further investigation is needed to fully understand its efficacy and safety.
Directions for Future Research
Additional research is essential to further evaluate the efficacy of rectal morphine. 20 , 1 , 4 Areas of focus should include identifying optimal dosages and administration methods, investigating long-term effects, and assessing safety comprehensively.
Conclusion
Rectal morphine shows promise as a potential pain management option for various conditions. 20 , 1 , 4 However, its potential for dependence and abuse requires its use under medical supervision. 20 Furthermore, awareness of potential side effects and consulting a doctor for any adverse reactions are crucial. 10 More research is needed to understand the full scope of its efficacy and safety, guiding its clinical use.
Benefit Keywords
Risk Keywords
Article Type
Author: HouXian Bing, ChenDan Dan, ChengTong Fei, WangDan, DaiXiao Jun, WangYao, CuiBi Xian, WangYuan Yuan, XuHui, ChenHong Zhou
Language : English
Author: TegonG, PulzatoL, PassarellaL, GuidolinD, ZussoM, GiustiP
Language : English
Author: LiCheng-Guang, HuangXin-En, LiYing, LuYan-Yan
Language : English
Author: YakootMostafa, SalemAmel, YousefSameh, HelmySherine
Language : English
Author: LeppertW
Language : English
Author: AhmedArif, KhuranaHimanshu, GogiaVikas, MishraSeema, BhatnagarSushma
Language : English
Author: LukasewyczStephen, HolmanMatt, KozlowskiPaul, PorterChristopher R, OdomErin, BernardsChris, NeilNancy, CormanJohn M
Language : English
Author: ButlerKristina, YiJohn, WassonMegan, KlauschieJennifer, RyanDebra, HentzJoseph, CornellaJeffrey, MagtibayPaul, KhoRoseanne
Language : English
Author: BrokjærAnne, KreilgaardMads, OlesenAnne Estrup, SimonssonUlrika S H, ChristrupLona Louring, DahanAlbert, DrewesAsbjørn Mohr
Language : English
The effects of morphine and methylnaltrexone on gastrointestinal pain in healthy male participants.
Author: BrokjaerA, OlesenA E, ChristrupL L, DahanA, DrewesA M
Language : English
Lack of genetic association between OCT1, ABCB1, and UGT2B7 variants and morphine pharmacokinetics.
Author: NielsenL M, SverrisdóttirE, StageT B, FeddersenS, BrøsenK, ChristrupL L, DrewesA M, OlesenA E
Language : English
Author: TeixeiraL R, LunaS P L, TaffarelM O, LimaA F M, SousaN R, JoaquimJ G F, FreitasP M C
Language : English
Author: CurleyTaylor L, ThammDouglas H, JohnsonSam W, BoscanPedro
Language : English
Author: PoulsenJakob Lykke, BrockChristina, GrønlundDebbie, LiaoDonghua, GregersenHans, KroghKlaus, DrewesAsbjørn Mohr
Language : English
Author: AldrichEmily R, TamTiffanie Y, SaylorLeah M, CrispCatrina C, YeungJennifer, PaulsRachel N
Language : English
Author: KanaziGhassan E, AouadMarie T, AbdallahFaraj W, KhatibMohamad I, AdhamAl Moataz Billah F, HarfoushDiala W, Siddik-SayyidSahar M
Language : English
Author: CuiJia-Hua, JiangWan-Wei, LiaoYa-Jing, WangQing-Hui, XuMin, LiYu
Language : English
Author: FigueiredoJuliana P, MuirWilliam W, SamsRichard
Language : English
Author: Basurto OnaXavier, Uriona TumaSonia Maria, Martínez GarcíaLaura, SolàIvan, Bonfill CospXavier
Language : English
Author: WiffenPhilip J, WeeBee, MooreR Andrew
Language : English
Author: RaillardMathieu, Michaut-CastrilloJulien, SpreuxDamien, GauthierOlivier, Touzot-JourdeGwenola, Holopherne-DoranDelphine
Language : English
Author: SchäfferDébora Passos Hinojosa, de AraujoNayone Lima Lantyer Cordeiro, OteroAna Rosa, Dórea NetoFrancisco de Assis, BarbosaVivian Fernanda, Martins FilhoEmanoel Ferreira, OriáArianne Pontes
Language : English
Author: MayCasey C, OylerDouglas R, ParliSara E, TalleyCynthia L
Language : English
Author: Ping-Chen, LinQing-Song, LinXian-Zhong
Language : English
Author: ChuangChe-Wei, ChenKuan-Sheng, LeeWei-Ming, WangHsien-Chi
Language : English
Sex Comparisons in Opioid Use and Pain After Colorectal Surgery Using Enhanced Recovery Protocols.
Author: HrebinkoKatherine A, MyersSara P, TsangWai Lok, DoneyLuke, LazarSofiane, TengCindy, SubramaniamKathirvel, Holder-MurrayJennifer
Language : English
Author: HassingerTaryn E, KrebsElizabeth D, TurrentineFlorence E, ThieleRobert H, SarosiekBethany M, HoangSook C, FrielCharles M, HedrickTraci L
Language : English
This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.