This information is not medical advice and is not a substitute for diagnosis or treatment by a physician.Data sources and disclaimers (data limitations, copyright, etc.)The analysis on "Effective treatment of immune system and disorders: A Synthesis of Findings from 19 Studies" on this page is based on PubMed data provided by the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM). However, NLM does not endorse or verify these analyses.

This analysis is based on research papers included in PubMed, but medical research is constantly evolving and may not fully reflect the latest findings. There may also be biases towards certain research areas.

This information is not medical advice and is not a substitute for diagnosis or treatment by a physician. If you have concerns about "Effective treatment of immune system and disorders: A Synthesis of Findings from 19 Studies", please consult your doctor.

For NLM copyright information, please see Link to NLM Copyright Page
PubMed data is obtained via Hugging Face Datasets: Link to Dataset
Please check the disclaimer.
This page's analysis is based on PubMed data provided by the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM).
Original Abstract of the Article

Major Research Findings

Two studies, 3 and 5 , evaluated the effects of methotrexate in the treatment of Giant Cell Arteritis (GCA) and found that it may help reduce relapses and the overall need for corticosteroids.

However, a meta-analysis, 7 , indicated that using immunosuppressants in GCA treatment was not significantly more effective or safer than using corticosteroids alone.

A review, 19 , identified criteria and descriptors used to measure treatment responses and changes in disease activity in GCA, outlining various treatment approaches and their effectiveness.

A clinical trial, 11 , examined the effectiveness and safety of tocilizumab in inducing and maintaining remission in GCA patients, suggesting its potential benefit.

Another clinical trial, 12 , compared the efficacy of abatacept with placebo in GCA treatment, but it didn't find conclusive evidence that abatacept was significantly more effective.

Furthermore, a review, 16 , evaluated the effectiveness of endovascular therapy in GCA, suggesting its potential benefit.

Treatment Summary

Corticosteroids (CS) are the standard treatment for GCA. 9 mentions that in patients who cannot tolerate CS, biological agents may be considered. Multiple studies have investigated various treatments for GCA, including two studies assessing the efficacy of methotrexate ( 3 , 5 ), one exploring the effectiveness of aspirin ( 8 ), and two evaluating the effectiveness of tocilizumab ( 11 , 13 ).

Benefits and Risks

Benefits Summary

Treatment for GCA can help prevent severe complications, such as vision loss. 6 . Treatment can also improve quality of life for patients.

Risks Summary

Treatment for GCA involves risks associated with using corticosteroids. These side effects can include weight gain, osteoporosis, and high blood sugar. 7 . Using immunosuppressants can also increase the risk of infections. 7 .

Comparing Research Studies

Research Similarities

These research studies share the common goal of evaluating the effectiveness and safety of different treatments for GCA. All studies emphasize the serious nature of GCA.

Research Differences

The studies differ in several aspects, including the treatment they target, their design, and their findings. For instance, 3 and 5 focused on methotrexate, while 7 provided a meta-analysis of various treatments. 11 and 13 examined the effectiveness of tocilizumab, and 12 evaluated the efficacy of abatacept.

Consistency and Contradictions in Findings

These studies show consistency in their aim to assess the effectiveness and safety of treatments for GCA. However, some contradictions emerge. For example, 3 and 5 suggest methotrexate's effectiveness in GCA treatment, whereas 7 did not find immunosuppressants to be significantly better than corticosteroids alone. Further research is needed to address these inconsistencies.

Considerations for Real-World Applications

These research studies can guide the selection of treatments for GCA due to their focus on effectiveness and safety. However, it's important to remember that these studies do not encompass every patient. Factors like age, symptoms, and medical history must be considered when choosing a treatment for GCA. Additional research is required to comprehensively evaluate the effectiveness and safety of different GCA treatments.

Limitations of Current Research

All these studies are observational, preventing them from establishing a definitive causal relationship. Furthermore, these studies do not represent every patient. Additionally, while the studies assess the effectiveness and safety of different treatments, long-term effects remain unclear.

Future Research Directions

More studies are necessary to thoroughly assess the effectiveness and safety of different treatments for GCA, particularly focusing on long-term effects. These studies should encompass diverse patient groups to determine whether findings apply to all individuals. Finally, evaluating the cost-effectiveness of various treatments can ensure patients receive the best care while managing healthcare costs.

Conclusion

These research studies provide valuable insights into the effectiveness and safety of different treatments for GCA, guiding treatment selection. However, these studies have limitations, and further research is crucial.

When choosing a treatment for GCA, consider various factors like the patient's age, symptoms, and medical history. Additional research is necessary to comprehensively evaluate the effectiveness and safety of different GCA treatments.

Treatment List

Corticosteroids, Methotrexate, Aspirin, Tocilizumab, Abatacept, Endovascular Therapy, Biological Agents


Literature analysis of 19 papers
Positive Content
17
Neutral Content
0
Negative Content
2
Article Type
9
6
7
4
18

Language : English


Language : English


Language : English


Language : English


Author: HoffmanGary S, CidMaria C, HellmannDavid B, GuillevinLoic, StoneJohn H, SchousboeJohn, CohenPascal, CalabreseLeonard H, DicklerHoward, MerkelPeter A, FortinPaul, FlynnJohn A, LockerGeri A, EasleyKirk A, SchnedEric, HunderGene G, SnellerMichael C, TuggleCarol, SwansonHoward, Hernández-RodríguezJ, Lopez-SotoAlfons, BorkDebora, HoffmanDiane B, KalunianKenneth, KlashmanDavid, WilkeWilliam S, ScheetzRaymond J, MandellBrian F, FesslerBarri J, KosmorskyGregory, PraysonRichard, LuqmaniRaashid A, NukiGeorge, McRorieEuan, SherrerYvonne, BacaShawn, WalshBridgit, FerlandDiane, SoubrierMartin, ChoiHyon K, GrossWolfgang, SegalAllen M, LudivicoCharles, PuechalXavier,


Language : English


Language : English


Language : English


Language : English


Language : English


Language : English


Language : English


Author: LangfordCarol A, CuthbertsonDavid, YtterbergSteven R, KhalidiNader, MonachPaul A, CaretteSimon, SeoPhilip, MorelandLarry W, WeismanMichael, KoeningCurry L, SreihAntoine G, SpieraRobert, McAlearCarol A, WarringtonKenneth J, PagnouxChristian, McKinnonKathleen, ForbessLindsy J, HoffmanGary S, BorchinRenée, KrischerJeffrey P, MerkelPeter A,


Language : English


Language : English


Language : English


Language : English


Language : English


Language : English


Language : English


This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.