Effects of miconazole buccal: A Synthesis of Findings from 28 Studies
- Home
- Effects of miconazole buccal
This analysis is based on research papers included in PubMed, but medical research is constantly evolving and may not fully reflect the latest findings. There may also be biases towards certain research areas.
This information is not medical advice and is not a substitute for diagnosis or treatment by a physician. If you have concerns about "Effects of miconazole buccal: A Synthesis of Findings from 28 Studies", please consult your doctor.
For NLM copyright information, please see Link to NLM Copyright Page
PubMed data is obtained via Hugging Face Datasets: Link to DatasetPlease check the disclaimer.
Major Research Findings
Methylphenidate is a commonly used medication for treating attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children. However, there is still a lack of understanding regarding its effects on brain development. 27 A randomized controlled trial revealed that methylphenidate's effects on the thickness of the right medial cortex differ between children and adults. This finding suggests that the medication may influence gray matter development in this brain region. Further research with larger groups and longer follow-up periods is required to determine whether this effect is observed in other cortical regions and to assess potential long-term consequences.
Long-term methylphenidate treatment is associated with reduced height and weight, but the effect sizes are small and the clinical impact might be minimal. 28 The impact on weight is most prominent within the first year of treatment, while the impact on height is more noticeable within the first two to three years. The study suggests that long-term prospective studies are necessary to fully understand the underlying biological mechanisms and specific mediators and moderators of these effects.
Methylphenidate has the potential for abuse due to its behavioral effects resembling those of other abused stimulants like d-amphetamine and cocaine. 16 A study involving drug-abusing volunteers demonstrated that both methylphenidate and d-amphetamine can increase the likelihood of self-administration, with stimulant-like subjective ratings increasing in a dose-dependent manner. While both drugs share similarities in their effects, they are not identical. These findings reinforce the notion that methylphenidate has some potential for abuse.
Both standard and sustained-release methylphenidate are effective in treating ADHD in children, but the standard formulation shows greater benefits in reducing disruptive behavior. 4 A study examining the time course of both formulations found that sustained-release methylphenidate has a slower onset of effect than the standard form but its effects are evident for up to eight hours. Furthermore, individual children often respond better to standard methylphenidate.
A study using a choice procedure to assess methylphenidate preference in adults with ADHD found that, despite a significant preference for methylphenidate over placebo, other measures of abuse potential were not elevated. 14 Those who consistently chose methylphenidate had more significant ADHD symptoms at baseline and experienced greater reductions in ADHD symptoms. This suggests that methylphenidate preference in ADHD populations might primarily reflect its therapeutic efficacy rather than its potential for abuse.
Methylphenidate shows positive effects on academic performance in adolescents with ADHD, particularly at lower doses. 11 While some individuals benefit from higher doses, the most significant improvements are often seen between the placebo and 10-mg doses. Increasing the dosage does not always lead to further benefits and can even result in deterioration in some cases. This underscores the importance of careful dose titration and individual assessment of medication effects.
Stimulant medications are effective and well-tolerated in preschool children with ADHD, leading to significant improvements in behavioral ratings. 13 A study using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses found that more than 82% of the medicated sample showed a significant improvement in behavior, with over 50% improving by more than two standard deviations. Side effects were infrequent when using the optimal dose of medication. This demonstrates the potential of stimulant medications for improving behavioral outcomes in young children with ADHD.
Different formulations of methylphenidate can have different abuse liabilities, with extended-release formulations potentially having a lower abuse potential. 19 A study comparing immediate-release and extended-release formulations found that the extended-release formulation produced consistently lower subjective effects, particularly at early time points. This difference might be attributed to the slower ascending plasma concentration profile of the extended-release formulation, which may lead to a more gradual and less intense subjective experience. This finding requires further epidemiological confirmation but suggests that extended-release formulations might be a safer option for individuals at risk of substance abuse.
Methylphenidate can improve performance on psychological tests in children with learning disabilities, suggesting that it can enhance cognitive functions. 1 However, it did not impact standardized achievement test performance, indicating that its effects might be more focused on specific cognitive processes than on overall academic achievement. The study observed that methylphenidate had a particular effect on visual-motor processes, which positively affected performance tasks. This suggests that methylphenidate might be a valuable tool for supporting certain cognitive abilities in children with learning disabilities.
When administered at equal cardiostimulant doses, MDMA, methylphenidate, and modafinil have distinct acute subjective, emotional, autonomic, and endocrine effects. 26 This study provides insights into the differences between these stimulant-type substances, highlighting the need for further research to understand their individual effects and potential for misuse.
Methylphenidate does not enhance the psychotropic effects of MDMA, but it may increase cardiovascular and adverse effects when co-administered. 24 This finding emphasizes the importance of caution when using methylphenidate in conjunction with other psychostimulants, especially in light of its potential to amplify cardiovascular risks.
Methylphenidate has been shown to have a potential beneficial effect for relieving nicotine withdrawal symptoms, although it is not effective in helping smokers with ADHD to quit. 22 Further research is needed to explore methylphenidate's role in tobacco dependence treatment and to understand its potential for promoting smoking cessation.
The reinforcing and subjective effects of methylphenidate are modulated by sleepiness. 15 Individuals who were sleepier were more likely to choose methylphenidate, especially at a dose of 10 mg. The study found that individuals who received a 10-mg dose of methylphenidate experienced more pronounced drug effects. This highlights the importance of considering sleepiness as a factor that can influence the effects of methylphenidate.
Methylphenidate has a relatively low toxicity in preschool children, with minimal severe side effects. 9 Some behavioral changes often attributed to side effects are actually normal behaviors or ADHD behaviors in preschool children. The study highlights the importance of carefully distinguishing between medication effects and pre-existing ADHD symptoms, especially in young children.
Methylphenidate can lead to an increase in positive symptoms in schizophrenic patients, potentially due to increased dopaminergic postsynaptic sensitivity. 2 The study found that the increase in positive symptoms correlated with an increase in growth hormone levels, suggesting a possible link between dopaminergic activity and symptom expression in schizophrenia. However, further research is needed to clarify this relationship.
Parents and teachers may misinterpret ADHD symptoms as side effects of methylphenidate, leading to poor acceptance and compliance with the medication. 7 This finding highlights the importance of providing clear information and support to families and educators about the expected effects of methylphenidate and how to distinguish them from ADHD symptoms.
Methylphenidate effects in normal adults are similar to those observed in children with ADHD, suggesting that the drug's effects are not paradoxical or atypical. 5 The study found that methylphenidate led to improvements in performance, reduced physical activity, and increased emotional responsiveness. This supports the notion that the effects of methylphenidate are consistent across different populations and age groups.
Both d-amphetamine and methylphenidate can alleviate depressive symptoms, but they may have different neurochemical effects. 8 This suggests that individual depressed patients may respond differently to each stimulant, highlighting the importance of personalized treatment approaches.
Standard and sustained-release formulations of methylphenidate do not consistently demonstrate significant differences in their effects on children with minimal brain dysfunction. 6 The study found that both formulations showed limited improvements compared to pretreatment measures and that adverse reactions were similar. This suggests that the choice of formulation may be less critical for these specific patients.
The development of once-a-day methylphenidate formulations is ongoing. 12 The goal is to create a formulation that provides sustained and effective drug delivery throughout the day while minimizing the need for frequent dosing. These advancements are important for improving patient compliance and convenience.
Methylphenidate treatment has age-dependent effects on the human dopaminergic system. 25 A study using pharmacological magnetic resonance imaging demonstrated that methylphenidate treatment increases the cerebral blood flow response to methylphenidate in the thalamus and striatum of children but not in adults. This finding suggests that methylphenidate may have different impacts on dopamine function in developing brains compared to adult brains. Further research is needed to investigate the long-term implications of these findings.
Methylphenidate is generally well tolerated in adults and no serious side effects have been observed in short-term studies. 21 However, there is limited information about long-term safety, and misuse of prescribed medication is a growing concern. Methylphenidate can cause a modest increase in blood pressure and heart rate.
Methylphenidate can increase heart rate and induce dysphoric subjective effects in cocaine-dependent patients. 10 While it does not significantly increase cocaine craving or ratings of abuse potential, its subjective effects may not be positive enough for a replacement approach. This study suggests that stimulant substitution for cocaine dependence should be approached cautiously.
Methylphenidate treatment can improve ADHD symptoms in children with autism spectrum disorders, with no exacerbation of stereotypies. 23 The study found significant reductions in hyperactive and impulsive behavior, and parents reported improvements in inattentive and oppositional behavior, as well as social skills. Side effects were similar to those observed in typically developing children with ADHD. This finding indicates that methylphenidate can be a valuable treatment option for children with ASD and ADHD symptoms.
Benefits and Risks
Benefit Summary
Methylphenidate is an effective treatment option for ADHD in both children and adults. 27 28 4 11 13 14 21 23 It can improve cognitive function, academic performance, and behavioral outcomes. Furthermore, methylphenidate can be beneficial for managing nicotine withdrawal symptoms and potentially improving learning disabilities.
Risk Summary
Methylphenidate has a potential for abuse and may have long-term effects on brain development, particularly in children. 27 16 14 19 25 21 Long-term use is associated with reduced height and weight, but the effect sizes are small. It may also increase cardiovascular risks, especially when combined with other stimulants, and can induce dysphoric subjective effects in cocaine-dependent patients. Methylphenidate might also increase positive symptoms in patients with schizophrenia.
Study Comparison
Commonalities
These studies consistently demonstrate that methylphenidate can be a beneficial treatment option for ADHD across various age groups, including children, adolescents, and adults. 27 28 4 11 13 14 21 23 The research also highlights the potential benefits of methylphenidate in improving cognitive function, academic performance, and behavioral outcomes. It also reveals the importance of considering individual responses to treatment, dosage titration, and the potential for abuse.
Differences
The studies highlight the importance of considering the age and specific characteristics of the patient population when evaluating methylphenidate's effects. 27 28 4 11 13 14 21 23 The effects of methylphenidate on brain development and growth are more pronounced in children than in adults. 27 28 Furthermore, the study examining different formulations of methylphenidate suggests that extended-release formulations may have lower abuse potential than immediate-release formulations. 19 The study involving cocaine-dependent patients highlights the importance of considering the potential for dysphoric effects when using methylphenidate in this population. 10
Consistency and Contradictions in the Results
The research consistently demonstrates that methylphenidate can be a beneficial treatment option for ADHD across different populations and age groups. 27 28 4 11 13 14 21 23 However, there are also potential risks associated with the use of methylphenidate, including abuse potential, long-term effects on brain development, and potential interactions with other medications. 27 16 14 19 25 21 10 24 2 The research highlights the importance of weighing the potential benefits and risks of methylphenidate treatment and of carefully considering individual patient needs.
Implications for Everyday Life
Methylphenidate can be a valuable treatment option for individuals with ADHD. 27 28 4 11 13 14 21 23 However, it's important to discuss the potential risks and benefits with a healthcare professional. 27 16 14 19 25 21 10 24 2 It's essential to take methylphenidate as prescribed and to monitor for any potential side effects. 27 16 14 19 25 21 10 24 2 If you have any concerns, be sure to consult with your healthcare provider.
Limitations of Current Research
There are limitations to the existing research on methylphenidate. 27 28 4 11 13 14 21 23 Further research with larger sample sizes, longer follow-up periods, and diverse populations is needed to understand the long-term effects of methylphenidate and to further explore its potential benefits and risks.
Future Research Directions
Future research should focus on investigating the long-term effects of methylphenidate on brain development, particularly in children. 27 28 13 21 25 Researchers should also explore the potential for methylphenidate to be used as a therapeutic agent for other conditions, such as nicotine dependence and learning disabilities. 22 1 Additionally, research is needed to develop strategies for minimizing the potential for abuse and to understand the effects of methylphenidate on specific neurocognitive processes.
Conclusion
Methylphenidate is a valuable treatment option for ADHD, but it's important to weigh its potential benefits against its risks. 27 28 4 11 13 14 21 23 16 19 25 21 10 24 2 It's crucial to work closely with a healthcare professional to determine if methylphenidate is the right treatment option and to monitor its effects. 27 16 14 19 25 21 10 24 2 Continued research is needed to better understand the long-term impacts of methylphenidate and to explore its potential for treating other conditions.
Benefit Keywords
Risk Keywords
Article Type
Author: Gittleman-KleinR, KleinD F
Language : English
Author: SharmaR P, JavaidJ I, PandeyG N, JanicakP G, DavisJ M
Language : English
Author: SharmaR P, JavaidJ I, PandeyG N, EastonM, DavisJ M
Language : English
Author: PelhamW E, SturgesJ, HozaJ, SchmidtC, BijlsmaJ J, MilichR, MoorerS
Language : English
Author: AmanM G, VamosM, WerryJ S
Language : English
Author: WhitehouseD, ShahU, PalmerF B
Language : English
Author: FineS, JohnstonC
Language : English
Author: LittleK Y
Language : English
Author: FirestoneP, MustenL M, PistermanS, MercerJ, BennettS
Language : English
Laboratory measures of methylphenidate effects in cocaine-dependent patients receiving treatment.
Author: RoacheJ D, GrabowskiJ, SchmitzJ M, CresonD L, RhoadesH M
Language : English
Author: EvansS W, PelhamW E, SmithB H, BuksteinO, GnagyE M, GreinerA R, AltenderferL, Baron-MyakC
Language : English
Author: SwansonJames, GuptaSuneel, LamAndrew, ShoulsonIra, LernerMarc, ModiNishit, LindemulderElizabeth, WigalSharon
Language : English
Author: ShortElizabeth J, ManosMichael J, FindlingRobert L, SchubelEmily A
Language : English
Author: FredericksEmily MacDonald, KollinsScott H
Language : English
Author: RoehrsTimothy, JohansonChris Ellyn, MeixnerRenata, TurnerLauren, RothThomas
Language : English
Author: StoopsWilliam W, GlaserPaul E A, FillmoreMark T, RushCraig R
Language : English
Author: MartinCatherine A, GuenthnerGreg, BingcangChristopher, RayensMary Kay, KellyThomas H
Language : English
Author: CoghillDavid R, RhodesSinead M, MatthewsKeith
Language : English
Author: ParasrampuriaDolly A, SchoedelKerri A, SchullerReinhard, SilberSteven A, CicconePatrick E, GuJoan, SellersEdward M
Language : English
Effects of once-daily oral and transdermal methylphenidate on sleep behavior of children with ADHD.
Author: FaraoneStephen V, GlattStephen J, BuksteinOscar G, LopezFrank A, ArnoldL Eugene, FindlingRobert L
Language : English
Author: GodfreyJ
Language : English
Author: HurtRichard D, EbbertJon O, CroghanIvana T, SchroederDarrell R, SoodAmit, HaysJ Taylor
Language : English
Author: PearsonDeborah A, SantosCynthia W, AmanMichael G, ArnoldL Eugene, CasatCharles D, MansourRosleen, LaneDavid M, LovelandKatherine A, BuksteinOscar G, JergerSusan W, FactorPerry, VanwoerdenSalome, PerezEvelyn, ClevelandLynne A
Language : English
Author: HysekCédric M, SimmlerLinda D, SchillingerNathalie, MeyerNicole, SchmidYasmin, DonzelliMassimiliano, GrouzmannEric, LiechtiMatthias E
Language : English
Author: SchranteeAnouk, TammingaHyke G H, BouzianeCheima, BottelierMarco A, BronEsther E, MutsaertsHenk-Jan M M, ZwindermanAeilko H, GrooteInge R, RomboutsSerge A R B, LindauerRamon J L, KleinStefan, NiessenWiro J, OpmeerBrent C, BoerFrits, LucassenPaul J, AndersenSusan L, GeurtsHilde M, RenemanLiesbeth
Language : English
Author: DolderPatrick C, MüllerFelix, SchmidYasmin, BorgwardtStefan J, LiechtiMatthias E
Language : English
Author: WalhovdK B, AmlienI, SchranteeA, RohaniD A, GrooteI, BjørnerudA, FjellA M, RenemanL
Language : English
Author: CarucciSara, BaliaCarla, GaglianoAntonella, LampisAngelico, BuitelaarJan K, DanckaertsMarina, DittmannRalf W, GarasPeter, HollisChris, InglisSarah, KonradKerstin, KovshoffHanna, LiddleElizabeth B, McCarthySuzanne, NagyPeter, PaneiPietro, RomanielloRoberta, UsalaTatiana, WongIan C K, BanaschewskiTobias, Sonuga-BarkeEdmund, CoghillDavid, ZuddasAlessandro,
Language : English
This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.